This thread reached a point were a lot of people became frustrated by duckber, myself included. Insults are not the way but he derailed the thread completely, a lot of useful information just buried. there are complete pages on this thread, full of him going back and forth with other people and spreading non verified information. One thing is to have your point of view on things and other is to try to impose your opinion as an absolute truth. I'm not taking any side but this are my two cents as a side viewer.
Except I haven't "derailed" anything except for giving my opinion which has been backed up by photographic evidence and people who handled the rep and gen who can corroborate my claims? How are people who handle the rep in person stating what I am saying not verifiable? Not only that, but VSF has actually updated a few of my criticisms with later batches. Something I brought up to you multiple times that you conveniently ignored. Is that not considered "verifiable" by your definition? So what's the issue? Let's not also forget that you've been doing the same thing criticizing other watches on these forums like ZZF and Noob, models you have not actually handled in real life but are criticizing claiming they're worse than VSF, which is will within your rights to do but I suppose that's okay to be hypocritical as long as it's not VSF eh?
Let's take one of my favorite posters here, KJ2020 with a detailed post on the new ROF and its criticisms:
https://forum.replica-watch.info/for...83#post9572683
A watch he has yet to handle but has given well received advice by judging photos. According to your own philosophy, this is not allowed. Yet you've broken this rule all the time?
You also state: "One thing is to have your point of view on things and other is to try to impose your opinion as an absolute truth"
Ooooh, this is a good one. Please, show me any post of mine where I claim my post is the absolute truth and harassed others for feeling differently? Have I chastised anyone with vitriolic comments for disagreeing with me? If so, please provide proof because that is one WILD accusation. But you won't, cause you slander me and then ignore me when I continuously ask you to provide proof. You also said I "twisted people's comments" to fit my agenda and have yet to elaborate what my agenda is or what I have twisted out of context.
I'm not taking any side but this are my two cents as a side viewer.
This is hilarious nonsense, you've been clearly taking a side by calling me and idiot, slandering me and misconstruing my opinions and arguments simply because I have objective criticisms of VSF, a factory that for some reason you seem biased for. If you continue to slander me on these forums for having a different opinion than you as "imposing an absolute truth" I'd really like for you to back up such a heinous claim. Please show the posts where I harassed others for thinking differently and gave off a manner of "imposing"?
Newsflash, having a different opinion than you is not imposing.
But you'll conveniently ignore this while you always do.