- 20/3/17
- 2,158
- 2,442
- 113
Here are a couple more photos to add to the comparison above. After tripdog shaves down the caseback (which is definitely a 16610 caseback), these thin up real nice.
LEFT is ST16610 w/ gen 16710 caseback.
RIGHT is VN case after tripdog’s work
Same height - minus crystal on VN caseset.
LEFT = ST w/ gen caseback
RIGHT = VN reworked vn caseset
Notice the base before the threads start? Sits flatter on the 16710 caseback. BUT, remember the first pic — both cases sitting at the same height
LEFT = VN reworked caseback
RIGHT = ST w/ gen caseback
Definitely flatter on the VN caseback... lol
LEFT is ST16610 w/ gen 16710 caseback.
RIGHT is VN case after tripdog’s work
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0401a/0401aadac005c8980938608fad07470459336697" alt=""
Same height - minus crystal on VN caseset.
LEFT = ST w/ gen caseback
RIGHT = VN reworked vn caseset
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25827/258272889ace56483083e834fdecda5d964ff1ec" alt=""
Notice the base before the threads start? Sits flatter on the 16710 caseback. BUT, remember the first pic — both cases sitting at the same height
LEFT = VN reworked caseback
RIGHT = ST w/ gen caseback
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/618b0/618b0676593a49937790e116968a79d753319888" alt=""
Definitely flatter on the VN caseback... lol