Jurgenk
I'm Pretty Popular
- 28/5/07
- 1,092
- 935
- 113
The rubberclad bezel is actually a stainless steel bezel "clad" in rubber, and hence the name. On the rose gold RC, the bezel is rose gold like the case.
But no, shaving the bezel will not help, or modifying the tachy, as we will be replacing one flaw with another. I work with the movement positioning instead and adjust the rest of the components around this.
Agree very much with this point, having the movement placed optimally helps, while having it off axis or too forward or deep creates all kinds of issues. Drilling the crown tube exactly where you need it is critical, and hard to correct via other adjustments if it is off.
A major issue is that the JF rep crystal is 1.8 mm and doesn’t close the gap well with the stock bezel and rubber gasket.
Others have shaved the rubber gasket that sits between the mid case and bezel as I’m sure legend is aware.
I’m not a fan of this approach because the rep gasket is actually the same thickness as the gen gasket, so shaving it down is a tell in my book, unless it is done with restraint. However this approach can be used to achieve a thinner than gen watch precisely by using this method to close the gap found with a 1.8 mm crystal. Thicknesses of 13.8 mm are possible resulting in a very comfortable AP ROO. This is the ROO AP could have built but didn’t.
Replacing the rep sapphire 32 mm x 1.8 mm crystal with a 32 mm x 2.45 mm (Prof sells these) corrects the gap further and gives some sense of the top heaviness of the gen without overdoing it. Going full 3.0 mm thickness is not recommended as the rep crystal gasket and its pocket are not as deep as found on the gen bezel. It will fit but it seems less stable to me.
Last edited: