Probably end up being repped with grade 2 titanium.Source for sure, question is at what price and will they be able to machine it at a high enough level? It supposed to be a very hard material and difficult to work with.
Grade 5 would be nice to hide the scratches though.So long as the visuals match, I don't really give too much of a shit about the grade for the purposes of the rep.
Grade 5 does seem to have some interesting properties, though.
So it means all the Ti reps face the same problem of getting scratches easily too?Problem is with lower grade titanium is it scratches really easily. I've had a replica pelagos and own a genuine one. The genuine is virtually scratch free (it's an original 2 liner), but the replica was almost as much of a scratch magnet as a PCL, having accumulated more scratches in a year of mild use before I sold it along. That being said, I'm curious how the repsters will do with this one. It's definitely an interesting model and a huge step for Rolex.
This is my personal experience with a direct genuine to replica ownership comparison (I had a two liner v1 and a V2 5 liner replica) vs a genuine 2 liner. I've got other Panerai titanium reps which don't exhibit many scratches and have been worn at least as much, but my issue was primarily the bracelet scratching on the pelagos, not so much the head. I don't remember any significant marring on the head.So it means all the Ti reps face the same problem of getting scratches easily too?
Me too.I have a titanium pelagos and a NTTD... both are unmarked and wearing well.
I really want this one! Lots.
If VSF can come up with this one like what they have achieved for the YM 42 WG, and ofc this time they have to invest into the new Ti Oyster bracelet too, then surely the Ti YM 42 will quickly become one of the most sought after pieces in the rep market