Not sure if it's the difference in angle but the S39 looks like the 'm' floats a little less
And the floating "m"Look at this lovey SEL step, nice and sharp and defined. Not blunt and soft edged like they were before. This is a major improvement of a flaw that was visible on someones wrist.
Rehaut first R is fixed and the rest of the rehaut aligment looks fine, this looks like a gen Sub buddy. If they can just fix the cyclops now it'll be perfect.
The dates are still not quite centred on the double digits dates though when compared to gen. So if you would like to show off the watches, make sure it's not on the 20th - 31st of the month, 10th to 19th seems ok.
Look at this lovey SEL step, nice and sharp and defined. Not blunt and soft edged like they were before. This is a major improvement of a flaw that was visible on someones wrist.
Rehaut first R is fixed and the rest of the rehaut aligment looks fine, this looks like a gen Sub buddy. If they can just fix the cyclops now it'll be perfect.
I was not aware there was an issue with the SEL step on the 116610 VSF? I thought it was only an issue on the 126610 VSF. FYI: the SEL step on the gen 116610 is slightly more defined compared to the SEL step on the gen 126610 (see pics below of both gens side by side). So that "soft step" is actually gen like on the VSF 126610....the problem is it's just a little too soft compared to gen.
The SEL step height on the 116610 is fine, but it’s blunt and soft edged compared to the razor sharp defined step on the gen, that was the problem