Hi all,
I deicide to take the plunge and buy my very first replica i have seen Koster88's Review of the New TAG Grand Carrera Chronograph. I like it at first sight.
I bought it from http://www.timeshops.net/TG9155_-_Tag_Heuer_Grand_Carrera_Black_Dial_SS_-_Asia_7750_28800bph_2505-4071.htm
Hope the Differences have been rectified: from what Koster88 pointed out
Biggest mistake I found, was on the rotor stamp. It is marked Caliber 16, when it should say Caliber 17. Whoops:
Gen hands Have Lume, Rep Hands do not.
AR is a Very slightly different Tint. The AR is very good, and unless you had them side by side like I did, you could never ever tell.
I think the Tag logo on the Dial is a little off center. This is probably just a QC issue. Maybe its just my eyes.
Date Wheel is a little further recessed than the Gen. However, it does not stand out like a sore thumb because the Gen is also recessed, just not quite as far.
I deicide to take the plunge and buy my very first replica i have seen Koster88's Review of the New TAG Grand Carrera Chronograph. I like it at first sight.
I bought it from http://www.timeshops.net/TG9155_-_Tag_Heuer_Grand_Carrera_Black_Dial_SS_-_Asia_7750_28800bph_2505-4071.htm
Hope the Differences have been rectified: from what Koster88 pointed out
Biggest mistake I found, was on the rotor stamp. It is marked Caliber 16, when it should say Caliber 17. Whoops:
Gen hands Have Lume, Rep Hands do not.
AR is a Very slightly different Tint. The AR is very good, and unless you had them side by side like I did, you could never ever tell.
I think the Tag logo on the Dial is a little off center. This is probably just a QC issue. Maybe its just my eyes.
Date Wheel is a little further recessed than the Gen. However, it does not stand out like a sore thumb because the Gen is also recessed, just not quite as far.