Still. From the same Wikipedia source ([ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Made"]Swiss Made - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]), here is the simple definition:
====Swiss watch====
A watch is considered Swiss, according to the Swiss law if:
*its movement is Swiss (me - Tick for Steinhart),
*its movement is cased up in Switzerland (me - appears to be another tick for Steinhart)
*the manufacturer carries out the final inspection in Switzerland (me - not sure here - most likely another tick for steinhart?)
So I am still not sure why they are seen by some as not Swiss-made? As far as I go, they appear to satisfy all basic requirements for the definition and therefore shall be treated on par with the other above mentioned cheap-ish brands from the infamous Swatch group - but - would probably represent a better value-for-money (such as decent decorated movements at least!) for what they are? And above all, they are probably a fairly well made (quality-wise) pieces, considering some are coming with 2 years of warranty which even longer than much more expensive likes of Tags and Omegas? Not that I am running head over heels to get a Steinhart but I think if one does not really care for a brand name on the dial than Steinhart folks are representing somewhat of a fair offer, on par with many other Swiss brands that are charging a LOT more for similar product, assembled in similar circumstances from very similar parts sourced from similar suppliers located in similar countries

) No?