• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

SS 316L vs. 316F vs. 904L- The final VERDICT- A technical study

Clarity93

Getting To Know The Place
26/10/22
34
29
18
I just came across this great write-up and have to say: I learned a lot!



But to BoulderJ's point: when the factories today claim that they are using "Rolex-grade" 904L steel - is this true? Prices increased accordingly ;)
I’m not a material specialist by any means, but I’ve recently ordered two VSF subs 126610LN from Ryan. They’re advertised as 904L, Ryan confirmed 904L and it happens that I had a neodymium magnet laying around. I’ve checked both bracelets and they show no signs of attraction whatsoever. The color is spot on like gen. I have some points to think that 904L might have been used there, but I would like to get 100% confirmation.
 

Fabulously

Active Member
Supporter
Certified
13/11/17
455
1,128
93
Lalaland
I’m not a material specialist by any means, but I’ve recently ordered two VSF subs 126610LN from Ryan. They’re advertised as 904L, Ryan confirmed 904L and it happens that I had a neodymium magnet laying around. I’ve checked both bracelets and they show no signs of attraction whatsoever. The color is spot on like gen. I have some points to think that 904L might have been used there, but I would like to get 100% confirmation.

Thanks for your thoughts! This is indeed interesting. I am just wondering whether 316L or 316F stainless steel alloys are magnetic at all? My understanding was that all of these high great steel variants were supposed to be rather non-magnetic...
 

Dokraven

Getting To Know The Place
MULTI ACCOUNT
4/5/22
16
5
3
Good info here. Thanks. My 904L sub has held up surprisingly very well to wear and tear, but better than the specs would lead you to believe.
 

zoullo1

Getting To Know The Place
5/7/18
22
1
3
Bonjour, je viens de voir une usine ( QF ) qui propose des daytona en or avec cette description : Boîtier en acier inoxydable massif 904L plaqué ou jaune 18 carats, réplique 1:1, métal Cu-W pour augmenter le poids de la montre pour correspondent au poids de la montre en ou véritable, presque le même poids que la montre authentique.
Connaissez vous ce métal : Cu-W ?
Merci d'avance.
 

Karbon74

Pika Factory
Patron
Certified
5/5/23
9,563
18,337
113
EU - Kalos Region
Bonjour, je viens de voir une usine ( QF ) qui propose des daytona en or avec cette description : Boîtier en acier inoxydable massif 904L plaqué ou jaune 18 carats, réplique 1:1, métal Cu-W pour augmenter le poids de la montre pour correspondent au poids de la montre en ou véritable, presque le même poids que la montre authentique.
Connaissez vous ce métal : Cu-W ?
Merci d'avance.
Tungsten Copper
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gabdan

WatchN3RD

I supported. Doesn't make me an expert!
Gold Patron
24/7/18
513
578
93
I can't add much, but I can say with comfort that cheap stainless steel is magnetic. Haven't you walked in a new-ish public bathroom and noticed the "stainless" railings are already rusting?
The old school trick for building materials was to make 100% sure that the "rust free" steel you purchased was non-magnetic. There could be a few exceptions, but I doubt those apply to watches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gabdan

gvogia

Do not accept unsolicited offers
15/4/23
6
4
3
Greece
From my little experience in metals sorting business, 316 and 904l have no magnetic properties. Lower grades of stainless steel like 4xx series are magnetic. A common stainless in the daily applications is 304 and is in general non-magnetic, but it could become partially magnetic under cold processing/ forging. I also purchased recently a VSF sub 126610LN that is supposed to have 904l alloy. I have at the yard equipment that could read the type of alloy the watch is made of, but this would lead to slightly damaging the surface of the watch on the contact spot, so I don’t think I’ll make an attempt 😊
 

nycevan

Watch Fan
Certified
20/5/16
45
29
18
From my little experience in metals sorting business, 316 and 904l have no magnetic properties. Lower grades of stainless steel like 4xx series are magnetic. A common stainless in the daily applications is 304 and is in general non-magnetic, but it could become partially magnetic under cold processing/ forging. I also purchased recently a VSF sub 126610LN that is supposed to have 904l alloy. I have at the yard equipment that could read the type of alloy the watch is made of, but this would lead to slightly damaging the surface of the watch on the contact spot, so I don’t think I’ll make an attempt 😊
Very cool fun facts!
 

ne0viper

Getting To Know The Place
Certified
15/1/07
43
25
18
From my little experience in metals sorting business, 316 and 904l have no magnetic properties. Lower grades of stainless steel like 4xx series are magnetic. A common stainless in the daily applications is 304 and is in general non-magnetic, but it could become partially magnetic under cold processing/ forging. I also purchased recently a VSF sub 126610LN that is supposed to have 904l alloy. I have at the yard equipment that could read the type of alloy the watch is made of, but this would lead to slightly damaging the surface of the watch on the contact spot, so I don’t think I’ll make an attempt 😊
Good to know, thanks for the info
 

Nathanwatch44

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
Certified
5/12/23
59
14
8
France
article of extreme importance and could be useful to other people in my case was wondering about the different materials used on our rep
 

rossco17111

Getting To Know The Place
13/12/23
19
18
3
Interesting. I’m actually a little surprised to learn that nobody actually knows if the Rolex reps are using 904 now or not. I would have thought this to have been sorted years ago.
Agree, as I’m reading a lot of reps now advertised as 904, so would be keen to understand if that is indeed true or if all factories and TDs have become a bit more brazen on their advertising practices…
 

derjenigewelcher

Watch enthusiast
Supporter
Patron
Certified
22/11/20
8,457
10,801
113
Switzerland
For the weightet watches nowadays its not 904L. 904L is in Rolex SS Models.
But who knows. would be cool if PT would test again:)
 

aye154

Getting To Know The Place
10/12/23
65
21
8
904 does look more whiter as time goes pay because 316 does lose color.
 

Andrew_watchlist

Renowned Member
Supporter
Certified
28/4/24
560
686
93
It’s fascinating how much is trotted out as fact, that we tend to believe is the source appears knowledgeable. Your scratch test is a case in point, all I have read about 904L states it is softer than 316L, yet your real world test showed the opposite, so are the Rep manufacturers actually using even true 316L steel? I’d have to question that from your results. Also I have to accept my 126610 is not 904L.
 

Sirmoog

Known Member
Supporter
Certified
21/5/24
105
69
28
The info may be dated. I have recently read that 904 is only 1.3x the cost of 316, not 3x. This may make things more palatable for factories. Maybe therefore the listings are truthful, the TDs are truthful. Maybe. A $500 watch goes to $650. Possible.
 

mrjwatches

Do not accept unsolicited offers
13/6/24
3
0
1
Super informative, I was wondering what the actual/visible differences between 316L and 904L were.
 

injector

Getting To Know The Place
Supporter
Certified
29/3/22
72
25
18
As an mechanical engineer i will translate for Europeans:
EN1.4539
DINX1NiCrMoCu25-20-5
AISI904L
UNSN08904
The material 1.4539 or AISI 904L has excellent resistance to many organic and inorganic acids. Thanks to its high molybdenum content, this grade also offers good resistance to stress corrosion cracking and pitting. The material 1.4539 is seawater resistant.

But it is not a real special steel which rolex tries to think us.

EN1.4404
DINX2CrNiMo17-12-2
AISI316L
UNSS31603
The material 1.4404 or AISI 316L is one of the most commonly used corrosion-resistant stainless steels. Due to the 2 - 2.5% molybdenum addition, this material offers significantly improved corrosion resistance than 1.4301/1.4307. Due to its lower carbon content compared to 1.4401, the material 1.4404 is also characterized by good processing properties.

1.4404 is also nothing special its just A4 material which you can buy for stainless steel screws etc.
Problem 1.4404 is not full resistant against chlorides but butter resistant than A2 1.4301 or AISI 304.

By the way who knows if its A2 or A4 material, cause optical you cannot see it good.

What would be the real deal:
1.4529 which is marekt as HCR (high corrosiv resistant) also called 926.
EN1.4529
DINX1NiCrMoCuN25-20-7
AISI926
UNSN08926
Due to its high number of alloying elements, the material 1.4529 or AISI 926 has excellent resistance to numerous organic and inorganic acids. Thanks to its high molybdenum content, this grade also offers good resistance to stress corrosion cracking and pitting.

1.4529 or 926 will be used in tunnels or swimming pool area if done correctly and you are not living in a shitty country.

Stainless steel A8 1.4529 (also known as super austenitic stainless steel) is an enhanced version of the material 1.4539 and is characterised by its particularly high resistance (CRC V) to localised types of corrosion, such as chlorine-induced crevice, stress or pitting corrosion. Furthermore, it has good polishing and mechanical properties and can be used in a wide range of temperatures. For this reason, the use of this material to fasten load-bearing components is mandatory in certain sectors.
 

SS72

I'm Pretty Popular
Supporter
Certified
27/9/12
2,918
9,929
113
Australia
Super informative, I was wondering what the actual/visible differences between 316L and 904L were.
This has been discussed and debated adnuseam on this forum. Opinions vary.

Here's a gen and then two reps, all 904L, taken at the same time under the same light.

KgRnjs.jpeg


KgR8kD.jpeg


And then a 316, again under the same conditions.

3vXRxo.jpg