Luketriple70
Known Member
- 6/10/19
- 119
- 36
- 0
Very cool!....
Step into the ring and judge for yourself! Your input MATTERS!
....
https://www.ebay.com/itm/25-295CAR-...6-8bba-4113-b1b3-89d5c5864fe3&epid=1764854788
Happy to help you, brother
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
Beautiful, beautiful watch Ralphy! Your cyclops looks wonderful! thank you for sharing for comparison! The difference is very slight. The Clark has a deeper black hole effect but has the AR hue of post 2010 gen crystals. Your sexy BP has a clearer crystal and is a banger for the buck!Very cool!
As a new owner of a BP CHNR myself I am actually quite pleased with the crystal that BP put on it. I think it is better than the one on my GMF BLNR.
I actually acquired a gen crystal a little while back. I am aware that the 2834 ICHS movement has a higher hand stack and therefore the gen crystal can be problematic with having to file down the pinion and possibly having too high a magnification for the datewheel. That does not seem to have affected yours which AFAIR also has the iCHS.
I hoinestly think my BP's crystal is "good enough" for it, which is after all a cheap rep for only $240 with a somewhat iffy movement. To be fair I am having a hard time telling the faults of the crystal, perhaps I am not looking at it the right way.
I am going to keep the gen crystal for a possible future upgrade when/if VRF or ARF come out wiht a cloned movement BLNR or CHNR at which time I may decide to use it or if not sell it m2m.
Here are some pics of my CHNR under various angles for comparison with the Clark upgrade and the gen upgrade above
Beautiful, beautiful watch Ralphy! Your cyclops looks wonderful! thank you for sharing for comparison! The difference is very slight. The Clark has a deeper black hole effect but has the AR hue of post 2010 gen crystals. Your sexy BP has a clearer crystal and is a banger for the buck!
Sent from my DHGate Shitter V10 using Tapatalk
nice review!Okay lads, I've hunted everywhere but have yet to see a good comparison of these two options for a Rolex Crystal. I decided to be the guinea pig and get this party started.
One is $34.
The other is ten times the amount, at about ~$340+ depending on blister or not.
Step into the ring and judge for yourself! Your input MATTERS!
Note: CHNR doesn't have a gen datewheel
............................................................................................................................................................................
In this corner, the golden two tone that breaks bones! The BP CHNR fresh back from the up and coming oascom. It has a Clark 25-295-CAR that was said to be comparable to a gen 25-295.
In that corner, the superfranken that's ready to get some fists cranking. The 116710LN that's been super treated by the legendary misiekped. It has a gen 25-295. Let's get started, shall we?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6003 using Tapatalk
Yup, I have it in storage!Thanks mate. Didn't yours have the same crystal?
ARF stock crystalI’d like to compare a Clark to an ARF xtal, to me (from pics) they loook about the same and would be of about the same price
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If I want to get clark for 116610.
Anyone can tell me a ref
The ARF crystal doesn't look much different than the Clark on this picture. Not sure if that upgrade makes sense, probably better to go prof right away...?
Peeking in from the right, it's clear to see both watches have the SAME magnification, albeit the Clark having more AR effect. The black hole effect is also present strongly in both.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought that Clark puts the LEC on request?