IMO….
This is simply Rolex taking advantage of Bucherer not having an out and buying a business at an attractive multiple (Rolex has no interest in being in the retail business).
Without an heir to take over the business, Bucherer needs to sell. Who is putting up 8 or 9 figures to buy when Rolex is probably 50%+ of revenue and could cut your business off tomorrow? Theres no way in hell there isnt a change of control clause giving Rolex an out to stop using Bucherer as an AD if Bucherer sells, so any Bucherer buyer would have to pay ALOT to stay an AD. That makes the price untenable because Rolex has all the power. So Rolex is really the only buyer.
Does Rolex suffer if Bucherer says F U and sells to someone else and they lose Bucherer as an AD? Maybe for a quarter, but ultimately the other ADs pick up the slack because buyers are gonna buy Rolex regardless who its from, Rolex loses NOTHING long term (if anything they increased the perceived value of their product by making it harder to get).
Dont feel bad for Bucherer though, hes still walking away with millions, just not as much if Rolex didnt own his ass from day 1. That guy took a massive risk and aligned his business with 1 primary supplier….it worked out and he made millions (probably hundreds of millions over the years), but hes not getting top dollar on the way out…is what it is.
Rolex will buy his retail empire on the cheap after threatening to cut off ties, and then sell it for 10x what they paid, with a guarantee for 10+ or 20+years to sell through the new buyer (something that was happening anyway)
This was the Lufthansa heist all over again…Bucherer just got robbed in front of everyone in broad daylight lol.
Just my opinion though, could be totally wrong.