RM 50-03

[Tader]

Guess this is going to be on the market soon.
Any thoughts?

Sent from the RWI App

 

[barth]

Not really accurate (how could it possibly be ?) but very interesting !

 

[barth]

And why bother with a date when there isn't a date on gen ? icard:

 

[TagHeuerFan1963]

God damnit, why can't they focus on existing models making them better?

 

[_DC_]

I like it, not accurate but then RM reps never are, I think all these new RM reps can only be a good thing. The more they make the better they will get!!

DC

 

[_DC_]

Just checked and they are available already...



Very tempting!!

DC

 

[dams2912]

[QUOTE = "_ DC_, post: 3568438, membre: 56759"] Je viens de vérifier et ils sont déjà disponibles ...

[ATTACH = plein] 65288 [/ ATTACH]

Très tentant!!

DC [/ QUOTE]

Beautiful

 

[_DC_]

It is a good looking watch isn't it? Something about the asymmetry of having only the 6 and 9 subdials is really appealing I think.

It also looks to be a marginally better rep than the current RM011 (god knows if we will ever see the "amazing 1:1 new RM011). So in my book between the RM011 and this I'd have to say this looks the better choice?!?

DC

 

[barth]

It is a good looking watch isn't it? Something about the asymmetry of having only the 6 and 9 subdials is really appealing I think.

It also looks to be a marginally better rep than the current RM011 (god knows if we will ever see the "amazing 1:1 new RM011). So in my book between the RM011 and this I'd have to say this looks the better choice?!?

DC

Do you have a new RM on the way mate ?

 

[Tader]

Just checked and they are available already...

View attachment 48166

Very tempting!!

DC

Available where?

Also just heads up, it looks like it is thick af.

 

[_DC_]

Available where?

Also just heads up, it looks like it is thick af.

You got any pictures from side profile? The RM011 is pretty thick, and actually the gen RM011 is pretty thick too!

DC

 

[Stuvetjee]

too bad about the errors...
Just a small list lol:

-Why tf is there a date?
-There is a button missing on the rep (top left)
-Completely wrong hands
-Left subdial wrong digit printing. Has the cheap days counting now.
-6 subdial there is a moonphase disk in the back
-Subdial 6 wrong digits. should be printed for seconds
-Constant moving chronohand (there should be two btw)
-Wrong strap style
-Too thick red border around crystal
-Screws in the corners of dial look fake af
-Inner dial/movement holder should be from carbon aswell
-Crown should be rubber red, not steel painted red (looks like it)

 

[_DC_]

Strange that the chrono hand is always running. TD advised me that it's A7750 movement so surely working chrono?!

Agree the flaws are numerous, could make an equally long list about the RM011 though!

Stop pissing on my chips hahaha!!

DC

 

[Tader]

You got any pictures from side profile? The RM011 is pretty thick, and actually the gen RM011 is pretty thick too!

DC

Sent from the RWI App

 

[_DC_]

Looks ok to me, looks to be 18mm the same as the RM011 and all the other RM reps!!

More I see the more I like! Especially if it comes on the Velcro strap too, that'd be nice!

DC

 

[twilight79]

Me Wants!!!!!!
Is this available yet from any of our TDs?
Thanks

 

[rally4444]

Actually looks pretty sick


Sent from my iPhone using RWI

 

[barth]

Actually looks pretty sick


Sent from my iPhone using RWI

Yea looks badass in those pics...

 

[krispee]

Just checked and they are available already...

View attachment 48166

Very tempting!!

DC

Um, where exactly?

 

[_DC_]

Probably with all of our TDs, you just have to take the time to message them and ask!

DC