Agreed. The other issue is the indices don't line up the same as the gen against the tachymeter - but this is not that big a deal (for example the 120 doesn't like up with the 6 index marker line on gen).
The 60 and 120 are both supposed to line up on the gen and the rep, no reason for them not too. If they are not aligned, I believe that they can be aligned by adjusting the tachy manually. This isn't a flaw per se but a misalignment.
If we want to scrutinize 44mm ROO flaws, these are the usual general ones
- marker at 3 a tad too short
- datewheel depth not as prominent in the rep
- AP logo a little too much the right for the rep
- tachy font difference
- Thickness of case
- profile of caseback
- Entire movement is different, even with the so called "decoration plates"
- crown offset against pushers not present in rep
- hand geometry is different in the rep
- subdial numbers look slightly different
And for this specific model
- lume is too white on the rep dial and hands (they are creamy in the gen)
- color of the gold accents and datewheel is too reddish in the rep (gold in the gen, rep "gold" looks copper by comparison)
The above flaws mentioned mostly apply in an academic way for forum members to discuss and be aware of. In real life, they are more like "meh, so what?" lol