I've already read it and I personally disagree with this bit:
>We expect everyone to do their own research and homework as to whether an item is acceptable to them. If you haven't noticed a flaw, asking 38K members to jump in and identify all the problems they can possibly find is unfair to everyone. It's unfair to the folks who have taken the time and effort to learn about this hobby. It's even more unfair to the dealers, who have to individually buy the watches for you, inspect and photograph it, only to have you decide that some tiny imperfection which you never noticed in the first place, renders the piece unacceptable.
//
Again, we pay a 100 usd+ upmark for the 'privilege' of GLing or RLing a watch based on our personal decision. Sure there's a limit, but if someone is bothered by an (even slightly) crooked 12 index on their SMP they should have a right to discuss it AND rl it. Nothing insulting about it. It's literally REP RESELLERS we're talking about, not some artisans. They're literally businessmen, no one owes them any special treatment. I'm not advocating for RLing over the most microscopic stuff, but what you guys preach is the exact opposite.