Got mine yesterday and my wife just took it away from me....
My feeling is
Initial impression:
- Moderate
- Bezel thickness : Actually not , if you are not try to make it personal..
- Protruding crown : Yes it is, should be considered on V2
- Uneven twelve o'clock markers : I'm lucky and nitpick with the TD so it's pretty straight
- Occasionally misaligned datewheel : A little but not a big deal and for 46 of age, my eyesight wasn't that great (Not even bother change DW modify)
- Incorrect movement (duh) : Not compare to GEN but better than other in the market for now..
- Low
- Logo font : Yes a little thicker would be amazing
- Print quality : Agree
- Unfinished inner edges around the date window : Like OP said , Devils in the detail..
- 12 o'clock markers on mine reflect light differently and look like a mismatch : My wife took it from me so.. later i'll know
- Imperfect lume : Don't know yet
- Other small imperfections (e.g. dust, scratch) on either dial or movement : a week with it would be seen more
- Feel
- Some sharp edges inside the bracelet : a little and I preferred PF bracelet, PPF feel flimsy or may be it just thinner
- Bracelet clasp -- it's a battle trying to get this to open : Absolutely... same experience
- Crown is rough to wind : Me too and i think it is 9015 character.. I don't think clean & oil will help much as i did with my PF before.
- It's a high quality rep that seems to accurately capture the essence of gen design. Yeah..
- For the price, however, I wish the QC was better out of factory. If you read the megathread on PPF Nautilus, nearly every QC photo has either misaligned markers at 12 o'clock and/or incorrectly shaped markers at 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, or 11 o'clock positions.Yep
- Bracelet clasp is a huge pain to open. I expect this to be the first point of failure. If you know of a way to open this more gracefully, please let me know! On the same page
- Regardless or quality issues or tells, its a beautiful watch. It won't be this beauty if it is not from the picture you taken.