Impression on the wrist:
Rubber Strap :
I prefer the strap of the classic version, 3.0/3.5/4.1
This watch does not have the right fit for my wrist.
I have to wear it with a larger extent, compared to the classic Diver.
However, very comfortable on the wrist.
Case and Bezel :
I don't know any difference between the ceramic bezel and the case DLC.
The watch is perfect , and I'm very satisfied.
So , how Sharrkey had written.
Comfortable , impressive.
A black block on your wrist that challenge the world.:cheese:
I hope I can make a comparison with the gen soon.
Dial :
Even the dial is very precise and accurate.
You may not notice flaws or other errors.
The dial , remains much less visible than the Stainless Steel version.
All the "black" Case & Bezel , absorbs the black dial.
The hands are very visible and accurate in their accuracy.
Buckle :
The buckle is made very well.
There are the usual errors , compared to the gen version , but of little consequence.
Case-back :
Unfortunately , here , at first glance we immediately see that it is not gen.
Very nice the rotor , but the screw couplings to the caliber , it's disastrous.:facepalm:
The caliber Asia is immediately recognizable from the original version.:hehehe:
But , you have to see in hand.
On her wrist is difficult to distinguish the gen from the rep.
Then , in caliber AP , there are engravingn, not here.:thinking:
Final Impression:
I'm very pleased.
The gen watch that cost 20.000 and this more or less 500......:RWI:
The construction is great.
You've to wait for a version with the case-back made ??better.
Rating: 8,5/10
Junio ??M.