OK, well my point is that their members don't even regard their fellow thread comments. One of the first guys that responded, posted the link to the BESTSWISS image library, showing them the photo image was sourced from a replica seller's website!?
Even if you can't determine good from bad, the URL was pretty damning. (It sounds like the admins there cut the link later on, but before they did, half a dozen further TZ members chimed in, ignoring the aspect that was brought up initially - that the watch was a rep and reps aren't allowed on TZ ... )
He even came back and posted thank you's and another BESTSWISS catalogue image, so he was having a good old time with their membership ... or is as clueless as the rest?
I think the basic premise is not that REP's are well done, it's that the average person doesn't even consider the concept; even when given the possibility it wasn't real, their reaction was like closer to a dotting Mum's, "that's nice dear."