In one position, with no shocks or magnetic interference, and a whole lot of luck, perhaps... just perhaps.
Read my statement again... And pay attention to this part where it says '...can be achieved...', instead of 'is equal' or 'is better'!
A poorly adjusted Tourbillon powered watch that runs with -10.0s/d wouldn't perform better than a DG2813 that has been perfectly tweaked to run with +2.0s/d, now would it?
Of course, purely by "natural concept", a movement 100 times more expensive will have to be superior by design...
But my point was just that a cheap movement can also be adjusted to perform well. That's all. If you say that is categorically imossible, then you just haven't seen a well running cheap movement yet.
