-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
Noob Pam 005 QC pics
- Thread starter ebzen02
- Start date
Very cool. I love knowing little details like this. The only thing I am maybe seeing is the new P series gen caseback seems to have slightly fatter logo? Maybe it's just the lighting.
Your middle Pic above must be the old Noob M caseback. That logo looks very off. I like how Noob upgraded this on the latest release (as illustrated in the OP's QC Pic).
Last edited:
ebzen02 sorry to geek out on your thread lol. But I think all these replies directly and indirectly illustrate how good the NOOB you got is.
When you receive it, I would love it if you could take some pics of the dial (like the way I did with my M series H-factory), CG and crown area, and the caseback.
Based on everything so far, I think you made the right choice by going with Noob. Some do mention about quality controls on screws, CG lever tightness/fitment, etc. but those aren't really accuracy concerns I have.
When you receive it, I would love it if you could take some pics of the dial (like the way I did with my M series H-factory), CG and crown area, and the caseback.
Based on everything so far, I think you made the right choice by going with Noob. Some do mention about quality controls on screws, CG lever tightness/fitment, etc. but those aren't really accuracy concerns I have.
Last edited:
Yes, it is slightly fatter. If you look at the positive space left by the engraving (where the left is an "O" and the right is a "P"), the O and the P are noticeably thinner and the leg of the P is thinner on the 6834 case compared to that on the 6728 case. That's because of the increased thickness of the logo. They couldn't make the logo bigger so they decided to eat up the space on the inside of the logo.
Thank you for dropping knowledge on this. The new Noob caseback seems to have this pretty nailed down. My M caseback seems accurate enough for that time period too.
- 12/4/10
- 3,056
- 2,281
- 113
No worries man! Enjoying the details! Will take a bunch of pics when I get it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 12/4/10
- 3,056
- 2,281
- 113
No worries man! Enjoying the details! Will take a bunch of pics when I get it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 12/4/10
- 3,056
- 2,281
- 113
Overall I like the noob 005. My big concern were the lug screws but those unscrewed like butter..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks for sharing. I see that the font of the numbers is indented from the edge.
Is it strongly convex?
Is it strongly convex?
- 12/4/10
- 3,056
- 2,281
- 113
Yes.. it’s infented. Not strongly convex..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 12/4/10
- 3,056
- 2,281
- 113
That's good to know and your watch looks great to my eyes. Even the CG window to crown thickness ratio looks much better than the QC pics (CG window corners look better too Vs. XF).
- 12/4/10
- 3,056
- 2,281
- 113
For the price you can’t ask for much more. To me it’s a great daily beater that’s reliable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 12/4/10
- 3,056
- 2,281
- 113
Night shot
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Andysmart
Known Member
- 26/12/18
- 134
- 35
- 28
Night shot
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In this picture the lume color looks ok to me, not green at all. I was wondering if this lume could be whiter than XF?
Last edited:
- 12/4/10
- 3,056
- 2,281
- 113