Both colors are very well made, better than clean. I think they hit a home run!
I hear you but I would buy this watch just for all the parts and swap in a DDWhy SH ffs...
Yeah, apart from the shitty mvm looks more than promisingI hear you but I would buy this watch just for all the parts and swap in a DD
Is SH really that bad compared to DD?Yeah, apart from the shitty mvm looks more than promising
From experience in other movementsIs SH really that bad compared to DD?
No, its not.Is SH really that bad compared to DD?
Yeah, apart from the shitty mvm looks more than promising
From experience in other movements
Yes
No, its not.
Sorry but you are wrong. I have an APSF daytona for almost 3 months now, which has the same SH4130 like ZF. Johnny Depp took a look at it and said it's not bad, the finishing is not as clean as the DD one but who cares about that since its a closed caseback watch. It still runs great, i used the chrono a few times and had no problems at all. I daily the watch and bump it here and there, no problems. Same can be said about my BTF, but had a Clean and a Noob before that just stopped working out of nowhere. Its a decent movement, shame about the deco lever on the balance bridge that makes it harder to regulate than the DD version (which i still love, dont get me wrong).
EDIT: Forgot to mention that the rotor noise is also not bad, same as my BTF.
I would love to share more photos of the stock APSF watch and close ups of the SH movement but unfortunately its all in my old phone which currently i can't access since its broken. If i ever get arround to changing the battery and turning it on again i will share all i have about this version. Really its not that bad, my chinese Non TD said its the Shanghai factory that makes the VR, as in the beginning i also thought this SH is the same SH that ARF used on the 36 DJ. Not sure if this info is true, maybe a TD like Ctime can tell us more about this. Anyway in my case its working fine for now, will report if any problems come up in the future!![]()
Good looking on the info.
VR is called that because of first popping up in VRF watches, Like VS because of VSF.I would love to share more photos of the stock APSF watch and close ups of the SH movement but unfortunately its all in my old phone which currently i can't access since its broken. If i ever get arround to changing the battery and turning it on again i will share all i have about this version. Really its not that bad, my chinese Non TD said its the Shanghai factory that makes the VR, as in the beginning i also thought this SH is the same SH that ARF used on the 36 DJ. Not sure if this info is true, maybe a TD like Ctime can tell us more about this. Anyway in my case its working fine for now, will report if any problems come up in the future!
I recently added a section to my Comprehensive Guide post all about naming conventions of clone movements.VR is called that because of first popping up in VRF watches, Like VS because of VSF.
SH is not the same movement as a VR. You can read up on all of that in the tech section, I think @dogwood made the post
Bruh you’ve been here for 10 years and you’re asking this about a watch that hasn’t been released yet, for which we only have low def photos? Come on.Is CF better or ZF better?
Wait to the CZF² colaboration .Is CF better or ZF better?