NewFan0803
Active Member
- 15/1/16
- 402
- 22
- 18
I don't think it is like genuine. On genuine, the triangle is not recessed and in rep it is. To me that is a bad thing.
Are you sure that's not a CG render? The triangle there also doesn't look much different from the grey circle on the bezel. But anyway, recessed or not, the size is perfect and the bloody thing is even 30$ cheaper than the normal 42mm VSF PO, so definitely "shut up and take my money" material as soon as I see some RL pics. Please post yours once you get it!
Are you sure that's not a CG render? The triangle there also doesn't look much different from the grey circle on the bezel. But anyway, recessed or not, the size is perfect and the bloody thing is even 30$ cheaper than the normal 42mm VSF PO, so definitely "shut up and take my money" material as soon as I see some RL pics. Please post yours once you get it!
These reps must be god damn good that we are nitpicking about a recessed pearl.
This is exactly what I thinking. I have a 6" wrist...
It is not the pearl that is recessed, it is the silver parts on the bezel insert. It really is different if you have a gen with smooth insert and a rep that has deeper and higher parts on the insert. Meaning some parts are machined deeper to look similar to genuine but the production method should be filling holes and not making them! It shows AND feels when you touch with your nail. It was the biggest flaw on older ceramic SMPs and seems it is still an issue. Odd that they did fine on CRPO.
Have a look at this, seems the grey line on the bezel seems recessed after all on the gen. The triange you can't see 100%