Here’s a good general guide on reading timegrapher results:
https://rwg.cc/topic/143934-how-to-r...apher-results/
Also keep in mind, that the timegrapher results that you receive, aren’t necessarily a true indication of how the watch will perform on the wrist - they’re still useful though to rule out a bad one.
I agree. But in this case, the yellow is really a tad brighter. I saw many different pics and videos. Anyway, it's negligible.I would like to see two gen pics side by side and see the differences in screen resolution an magnification...all the comparison between gen and rep are pictures taken from different lighting conditions and resolution and will show up with differences which is natural.
Just look at chrono24 for difference in the same watches!
Hoping for that blue gen vs rep comparison. All the previous reps have been off in colour and sunburst effect.
After seeing the video of the blue rep repeatedly and having the gen in hand, I must say that they got the blue colour on the rep right this time. Its spot on. Even the teak pattern looks perfect and not too deep like on the previous reps.
Thanks for the video links, after analysing the video it seems the blue is still off. It's got a really dark blackish, blue/purple hue to it.
The gen has a blue and slight green hue to it in different lighting conditions. I guess we will need to see side by side comparisons.
Couldn't really tell in the video if the indices have the sloping down design like the gen. Need some lume shots too.
However everything else seems to be spot on, from teak style, sunburst effect, movement, hands, date, logo text, date wheel/window, overall finishing.
No, i'm in Singapore.
Ahh alright, if you were based here, I would have bought the VSF AT blue dial and sent it to you for a comparison with your Gen.
Thanks for the video links, after analysing the video it seems the blue is still off. It's got a really dark blackish, blue/purple hue to it.
The gen has a blue and slight green hue to it in different lighting conditions. I guess we will need to see side by side comparisons.
Couldn't really tell in the video if the indices have the sloping down design like the gen. Need some lume shots too.
However everything else seems to be spot on, from teak style, sunburst effect, movement, hands, date, logo text, date wheel/window, overall finishing.
Here is another video I just did of my gen blue AT. I still don't see any green hue that you mentioned. I've had the watch for over a year now so I would definitely notice if there was a green hue anywhere on the watch. It's all blue... Navy blue perhaps with a nice sunburst to it. The rep got it really really close imo. It's gonna be very difficult now to tell them apart.
Video of my gen blue Aqua Terra >>> https://youtu.be/lRHuhW14Yes
Yours is light blue, quite has a grey shade, the rep blue is still too dark
Gen is 13.2 thickness. AT wears big - see if you can try a gen before you order.
I’m genuinely interested in this watch. I’ve never tried one on, 41.5 and 13.5 is a little big but not bad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who cares about some small numbers on the backside/bracelet that nobody can see, unless you want to sell it as a gen.
I'm gonna wait, maybe they will release even more colours...(bi-colour with brown dial please), but the 15'000 gauss is tempting... and a fair price too.