- 11/7/16
- 2,429
- 2,349
- 113
It's just that the movement says "CENEVE" in huge letters...
not gonna lie, that video makes this MK the leader imo. markers and the date wheel is better than PF!
As far as I saw some pictures of the MK, the PF date wheel look better to me.....
As far as I saw some pictures of the MK, the PF date wheel look better to me.....
Can anyone comment on the MK5 Bracelet quality and whether it could be suitable for someone with small wrists (links removed ofc). Say 6.5" wrist? So far I have only got suggestions for the PF for small wrists but i cant imagine there would be all that much difference between the two? Especially with the now MK bracelet now being improved?
Just looked at the MKF vs PF on a side by side via photoshop and overlayed them and it clearly showed me that the DW cut out on the MK is a bit more to the left. So it will need a new DWO for this particular model.
it is a pain that all makers make their own dial specifications while producing their own digital templates for their own product and dont manage getting the font right...
while designing the DWO for the PF i felt the struggle with the numbers from 20 to 29 as the bottom of the previous 2 is visible on the current showing date when it is not properly centred due to the size of the font.
The PF got the best proportions compared to the gen while JJF or MKF mess up the font by using a different radius of the DWO by placing the cut out in the wrong place.
It is a pain for them to get everything perfect because there are too many aspects that need to be mentioned while there are too many suppliers for too many important parts.
As already said they try to deal with the problem of tolerances by using a smaller font... that said - without gen specification they will never achieve a decent look.
The devil is in the details.
Just looked at the MKF vs PF on a side by side via photoshop and overlayed them and it clearly showed me that the DW cut out on the MK is a bit more to the left. So it will need a new DWO for this particular model.
it is a pain that all makers make their own dial specifications while producing their own digital templates for their own product and dont manage getting the font right...
while designing the DWO for the PF i felt the struggle with the numbers from 20 to 29 as the bottom of the previous 2 is visible on the current showing date when it is not properly centred due to the size of the font.
The PF got the best proportions compared to the gen while JJF or MKF mess up the font by using a different radius of the DWO by placing the cut out in the wrong place.
It is a pain for them to get everything perfect because there are too many aspects that need to be mentioned while there are too many suppliers for too many important parts.
As already said they try to deal with the problem of tolerances by using a smaller font... that said - without gen specification they will never achieve a decent look.
The devil is in the details.
The devil is in the details.
Well explained sir....
If there's any one thing my interest in watches has taught me it's this.
Same here mate
Awesome! What color dial?Keylog74 In under a month I will give you my verdict of the MK V5 bracelet. Purely waiting till after the autumn festival to pull the trigger. Pics, review coming shortly and hopefully some valid feedback from notable members such as yourself & majwilliams0308 would be appreciated.