So has Noob updated the dial on this, or is this a completely new model that they have produced?
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
So has Noob updated the dial on this, or is this a completely new model that they have produced?
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
So has Noob updated the dial on this, or is this a completely new model that they have produced?
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
What I like about Rolex is the bracelet. Why would someone spend 30k on a Daytona with a ugly rubber band? Same is true for the Replica.
Sent from my iPad with Tapatalk
Excuse my (For a while resting from the watch world) eyes, what is the things that you see are off in the bezel?
Is this dial better or is the ARF dial better? Any experts can chime in?
Dial is MUCH better than ARF one which has some very noticeable errors ..
I don't see instead the bezel "so much better" on ARF vs. NOOB ...
Perhaps ARF has a lightly better font (perhaps !) but it has a wrong alignment between triangle and 140 that is much more noticeable IMHO ...
Where are these noticeable errors?
Dial lettering
Most important part of the dial, the bit you look at first 99% of the time
Noob - ROLEX lettering completely wrong 2/10
ARF - spacing under oyster perpetual too thick, lettering far more accurate 7/10
Subdials - practically the same, but noob joins up the lines at the end, only visible under a loupe
Noob - 7/10
ARF - 8/10
See below
Indices -
Noob - too rectangular, too big 6/10
ARF - even worse 5/10
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where are these noticeable errors?
Dial lettering
Most important part of the dial, the bit you look at first 99% of the time
Noob - ROLEX lettering completely wrong 2/10
ARF - spacing under oyster perpetual too thick, lettering far more accurate 7/10
Subdials - practically the same, but noob joins up the lines at the end, only visible under a loupe
Noob - 7/10
ARF - 8/10
See below
Indices -
Noob - too rectangular, too big 6/10
ARF - even worse 5/10
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk