I'm guessing you didn't see my previous post?
Have you put yours on a timegrapher and verified the beat?
see the smaller balance wheel ?
Yikes you have exceedingly low amplitude (normal range around 270 -310) and what about power reserve?
https://wahawatches.com/watch-talk-w...%20the%20watch.
It's cool that you have one of these bro, but it isn't something I would buy into. IDK where you could even get one. I looked pretty extensively and unsuccessfully at one time before finding so many negative things about them.
That was as soon as i got it , was just for the BPM check
ive since adjusted the BE down to .2
power reserve i dont know ive never checked it, but once on the wrist it doesnt stop
and fully wound amplitude is now 250 ish
ive had it for 3 years now
Very nice. You got a good one it appears. A movement freak among freak movements, haha.
Im thinking the ones stamped 1813 are not made by DG , but yea im not sure where to even source these other than trhough a TD (if thats even possible)
An old post, but still useful info. It appears the hb DGs were being pushed in the rep world around the time hb ETA clones were gaining momentum. The ETA clones won and the hb DGs died out.
See the final post.
https://forum.replica-watch.info/forum/flame-free-zone/92930-dg4813-what-is-up-with-this-movement
this isnt a 4813 , its a 2813-2S i think
Yeah, there were several different iterations and naming conventions used with hb DG's. If I could source a known good one like yours I have one watch in particular I would do it on. But I think it's too risky to try it with as many bad reports there are about reliability. It's also WAY too easy to snap the second hand pinion on a DG (.17mm) when removing and replacing the hand. I've done it several times and then you pretty much toss the whole movement since it's such a bitch to put the train wheels and bridge back together. Replacing the center wheel would be an easy fix otherwise but these are no fun to work on.
this thread is an rollercoaster of emotions for me is there any way i could get 28,800 beat in my watch now? from what ive read now replacing movement with 2836-2 and sourcing hands + dw right? i now feel like selling it and going for arf would be betteras you suggested
Haha... that's what happens to me with each rep model thread I read. :hi:
First eight pages: mhmmm, mhmmm, aha, I see... oh, really?
Page 34-45: ... but wait, why can't it have CHS? And isn't VSF/ARF/Noob better? But what about the "5" marker?
Last page (sees wristshot): niiiiiice - let's order that thang!
IMO the watch is really nice as is. If it were mine I would wear it without worrying about its shortcomings and when you are ready for something better sell this one and put the money toward the new one. You will almost always have something about a rep that you are not completely happy with. This will give you a chance to learn flaw tolerance without risking throwing money away on an uncertain upgrade or ruining a nice rep.
Yes, the Reddit post talks about those stamped 1813. They are made by Starking who bought the patent from DG when DG gave up on the 4813s. The poster said he got some tech sheets and saw no difference from the 4813s despite Starking claiming otherwise.