errr, doesn’t matter boxed or unboxed hence why I shared both Chrono24 originally and then followed up with some ig links…I owned the genuine watch up till a year and a half ago so I know what I’m looking for…thought I made out like a bandit (purchased at $34k, sold it for $105k) but obviously didn’t think the market would continue to melt up like it has, the more recent discontinuation definitely added to the frenzy even more. It’s still just a bloody ss watch at the end of the day!
Anyhow, I’m just trying to point out that the genuine article, regardless of boxed or unboxed logo has date numerals slightly closer to the left edge of the date box. Not touching the top like another person mentioned (only touches when still mid-transition between dates).
The numerals of the 20s-30s also have much less leading ie numerals are much tighter together than the teens.
Depending on year of the watch the font weight also varies. The gen I owned was a 2011 and is identical to buff’s datewheel font weight. Peggy’s dw font is neither the thin version or the thick version, it’s some weird in-between.
Hence, my observation that she created a problem that was never a problem to begin with. But I guess if you like your date numbers really centered and spaced out, then all the power to you…
Sorry what you have shown is the non box version so the argument about being left justified and closer to the top is somewhat invalid.
Even if that’s true, I would still request for my datewheel to sit in the center.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk