Another two months have flown by, and I find myself wondering — am I just too busy these days, or have I moved past the "fast-buying reps" phase? You know, that stage where you’re grabbing everything you really want. Now, it seems I only decide on something if it randomly catches my attention. Probably a bit of both.
During December, I had this sudden urge to treat myself to a new rep for Christmas. Naturally, I decided to check off the top of my wishlist: a 39mm or 40mm Explorer I. So, off I went to Sead. To my surprise, he told me he couldn’t ship at the moment — "doesn’t look good now." I have no idea what’s going on with him (of course, I hope he’s okay), but I knew I needed to look elsewhere for my Christmas shopping spree.
Speaking of the Explorer I, did I mention I grew up in Hong Kong and Seoul before moving to LA at 11? In both my childhood cities, Rolex was
the thing. And among all Rolex models, the Explorer I — especially the 14270 — was practically a holy grail. Why? Because the Japanese star Takuya Kimura rocked one in the 1997 J-drama
Love Generation. For the next couple of years, a 14270 in Hong Kong or other parts of Asia could fetch a higher price than a 16610.
I never actually owned an Explorer I until I got my 1016 here, which I showed earlier in this thread. The reason? Its 36mm size. It always felt a little too small for my taste. So, when Rolex finally launched the 224270, I thought,
Finally, something for me!
Here on RWI, members occasionally comment on the 224270, with the most common complaints being, "too big" or "the dial looks oversized." While I get those points, they’re not deal breakers for me. That said, I’ll admit the proportions and balance of the dial do feel off compared to the classic 14270. It’s just... different.
And yes, the dial
is big. Take a look at the comparison shot — it’s even bigger than a Daytona’s dial! I blame the minimal bezel for this optical illusion. It’s like the watch version of a “penis enlargement pill.”
I went with VSF mainly because of their VS movement. For me, the movement always comes first, and I still prefer VS over VR. That said, I had to accept the watch’s most glaring flaw: the undersized crown, which measures barely 6mm compared to the gen’s 7mm. Personally, I don’t mind the smaller crown — in some ways, I think it suits the watch better proportionally. But facts are facts, and the gen is 7mm. So, you have to ask yourself: do you really care about a flaw only a handful of people, standing uncomfortably close to you, will even notice?
Clearly, this wasn’t my concern.
And so, here’s my thoroughly unprofessional and completely useless write-up of my new 224270. Stay tuned — the next one shouldn’t take as long because I’ve got a Pam Fiddy heading my way soon.