I would not trust a world leader who does not wear a Rolex. Or owns one. ......................"What do you have on your wrist mister" ??????
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
Most Alpha Male Watch?
- Thread starter investmentbanker
- Start date
unk:The billionaire and philanthropist, Chuck Feeney, who made $7.5 billion and has given away all but $2 million for himself to live on, wears a $15 Casio watch and made his kids pay their way through college, and flies economy. He apparently invented duty free shopping. I have far more respect for that guy than I do my current watch obsession haha. I think wearing that Casio and giving away all your money to charities is pretty Alpha to be honest.
Here's the article.
He is not a world leader. Simply a loaded guy who enjoys giving away change. Bill Gates does the same thing. And wears a Casio too. I meant world leader like in King, President, Prime Minister, etc........ or even Dictator. Have yet to see ANY of those wearing a Casio. Even one. You got your 'stuff' all mixed up.
rolexwatchfan
Respected Member
- 17/8/13
- 4,240
- 824
- 113
Important is what he did with this Blancpain:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/16/putin-swiss-watch-factory-worker
I didn't realize 7-70B dollars was change haha. My stuff is mixed up? I don't know, I don't think politicians and alpha males really mix with democracies, which make up 100% of the developed world. You need to have a personality that constantly panders to the masses, and that is incompatible with being an alpha male. As previous stated, alpha males aren't supposed to care what other people think, a casio is fine.
True Alpha Male wears what every the fu*k he wants, whether it be a Timex or a Tourby. If you like it wear it proudly.
Insecure, narcissistic people think the size and cost of a watch increases their self importance and impresses others.
Insecure, narcissistic people think the size and cost of a watch increases their self importance and impresses others.
Go wear your Casio and start campaigning then. And don't forget to sling those wads of cash into your crowd !! :rofl: ..You still "don't get it" . :lol3: Nope !
George Bush wore a timex during the time of all his campaign, Obama wore a tag quartz, jorg gray after presidency, Clinton wore a timex during his campaign and switched to an assort of cartiers to frank mullers, no rolexes. I think you don't get that campaign is about connecting with the working class, how does a 10k watch help you do that?
If anything, I think CEOs with "wads of cash" are more likely to spend money on luxury and showy appearances. Leaders are suppose to represent their people, humbler image help them win more approval, distinguishing themselves from the mass public does not.
You are OFF TRACK !! ....Like I said, "YOU JUST DONT GET IT ! " Go ahead and campaign in your town !! Lol !! You don't !!.............You never will. Nope !! Smart ? Nah, nah !! Gezeeez..,,, :lol3:I guess there will always be cheap Casio and Timex lover advocates. :rofl: We don't have those here. ........There is a place for those watches, but higher office certainly is not. Most people don't think so. .................. It does not make you any humbler or manlier, it is complete hypocrisy to even flaunt a Timex or a Casio when you gots loads of high end watches waiting in your drawer. And ALL the folks mentioned above DO !! ................nuff said.........
i wouldnt be surprised if those SUPER rich people didnt give a damn about money or expensive things. They're in the business for a challenge, the challenge of making something amazing, taking control of the market, making as much money as they can just to have it, but not actually care about money. They also came from a different generation, their thought process is different.