Anyone know if the new GF V2 fixed the old flaws and improved on the dails?
the new question is now GF V2 or ZF...black or silver dial
the new question is now GF V2 or ZF...black or silver dial
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
MASTER ULTRA THIN MOON ZF Side by side with Gen comparison.
- Thread starter Repworld
- Start date
- 29/11/18
- 1,374
- 1,484
- 0
Gen has floating markers as discussed on other thread.
Maybe there are different gen batches but plenty of gens have the floating markers. I believe it’s a design intent. The shadow cast by the floating markers gives the impression of a more 3D geometry.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
heh, I'm in the same boat right now. In isolation I prefer the silver dial, but on the wrist I prefer the black dial.
fettersack111
Known Member
I'd recommend the white/grey dial. It look stunning. I've tried the black on at the AD and felt it wears a little small. And it would look amazing under white shirts or classy occasions. Legibility is also much better
Moon and stars on the moonphase look really, really off relative to gen.... is that just me or is that a known flaw on this model?
Rest of ZF is better in my opinion tho. Looks a lot crisper than GF
Last edited:
shortlegs
Active Member
- 31/5/19
- 493
- 271
- 63
The curvature of the ZF dial is wrong though. It only starts to curve towards the outermost section of the indices, rather than at the innermost.
And the moon phase is just... bad.
I'm not sure if the rest of ZF is truly better than GF, since sellers tend to prefer GF, although its suspected that its due to ZF's poor QC. But even if that was true, to me, it doesn't matter if it looks more crisp, if the dial and moon phase gives it away from further away.
And the moon phase is just... bad.
I'm not sure if the rest of ZF is truly better than GF, since sellers tend to prefer GF, although its suspected that its due to ZF's poor QC. But even if that was true, to me, it doesn't matter if it looks more crisp, if the dial and moon phase gives it away from further away.
- 29/11/18
- 1,374
- 1,484
- 0
I’ve handled/sold both ZF and Gf (various colours). I think they are both very good. Nothing looks off about either one irl. I prefer ZF overall. Just looks more premium and high quality to my eyes and that’s the main thing. GF has better strap, if that means anything.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 29/11/18
- 1,374
- 1,484
- 0
Have you handled both side by side or are you comparing pics.
GF is cheaper to get from factory...hence sellers preference.
It’s a different thing when you see in real life and appreciate the overall quality. The moon phase may look “off” in pics but in real life, it’s fine. It’s so bloody small and covered with reflections etc that any difference between gf and ZF is academic.
Just my personal opinion
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
shortlegs
Active Member
- 31/5/19
- 493
- 271
- 63
No I have not held them both in hand side by side, but I don't think that is a prerequisite to form an opinion.
If I can tell the difference in the moon phase even when viewed through the less than stellar quality videos by the Chinese sellers, then my natural conclusion would be that I do not have to hold them in hand to see the difference.
Note that I have never refuted the claim that ZF has better quality. I simply pointed out that the dial and moon phase matters more to me as they can be picked up even before the better quality of the ZF comes into play.
Last edited:
I've handled both, and the gen.
I'm perhaps a little biased as the ZF I got was m2m and caused me a load of problems. It's still in pieces a year later.
The ZF has indices that lift at the edges. This is incorrectly listed as a flaw - having tried on the gen, this was the case on that too. However obviously QC plays a part, some I've seen have been a little too lifted, it's very subtle.
There is a small difference in the dial - the J is very slightly different on the ZF, closer to gen.
Otherwise, I have to question if it's the same watch. Everything else is practically identical bar the Canon pinion and moonphase.
The moonphase is completely flat on the ZF. Unfortunately this is a glaring flaw. The moon is meant to be concave in texture. GF is not perfect but is much closer.
Flip the watch over and not much to see - a crappy miyota with some decoration.
It looks good from the front, you can be happy with both models, but for me GF is the one to go for.
Don't have any pics of my GF as it's in storage but I have an old ZF one, and gen here:
ZF
Gen
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm perhaps a little biased as the ZF I got was m2m and caused me a load of problems. It's still in pieces a year later.
The ZF has indices that lift at the edges. This is incorrectly listed as a flaw - having tried on the gen, this was the case on that too. However obviously QC plays a part, some I've seen have been a little too lifted, it's very subtle.
There is a small difference in the dial - the J is very slightly different on the ZF, closer to gen.
Otherwise, I have to question if it's the same watch. Everything else is practically identical bar the Canon pinion and moonphase.
The moonphase is completely flat on the ZF. Unfortunately this is a glaring flaw. The moon is meant to be concave in texture. GF is not perfect but is much closer.
Flip the watch over and not much to see - a crappy miyota with some decoration.
It looks good from the front, you can be happy with both models, but for me GF is the one to go for.
Don't have any pics of my GF as it's in storage but I have an old ZF one, and gen here:
ZF
Gen
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s interesting that even those who have handled both ZF and GF versions still hold differing opinions over which is best. I have a GF v2 on the way because I read that the moon phase is superior. I still had to reject the first one because of a wonky marker so QC is not perfect.
those that prefer the ZF seem to talk about superior overall quality, but I am not quite sure what this means? Does it mean for example that the case or materials used in the GF version are poor?
I have read that the J in the dial logo is slightly better on the ZF but I don’t see any difference to my eye.
those that prefer the ZF seem to talk about superior overall quality, but I am not quite sure what this means? Does it mean for example that the case or materials used in the GF version are poor?
I have read that the J in the dial logo is slightly better on the ZF but I don’t see any difference to my eye.
Hi, i am new here. I have just order this model too but it is a cheaper version. Don't know what the factory from. Here is my QC pic need to be approved. Just want to share and need some comments. Thx u.
How reliable are those movements? I thought about adding a nice dresswatch to my collection and this one is really gorgeous. The only issue I see with it are the complications. I won't wear the watch that often as I'm more of a sports watch guy and I'm not sure if I would really want to set the moonphase everytime I wear this watch. That's why I'm leaning a bit more towards a simple 3 hand watch, maybe even without a date window. I'm a bit torn between this one and a gen Nomos Orion 35.
