- 16/4/22
- 481
- 545
- 93
Gen vs. DHGate "Cindywatch" rep. It's very close but a few issues IMO. Might actually keep the Gen.
Good:
- Case/caseback size, shape, finishing. Gen Ti case looks nearly identical to SS case on rep.
- Lume is actually pretty comparable to Gen.
- Subdial printing is correct with no major issues.
- Crystal shape & A/R very similar.
Issues:
- Dial color really is different. Tried to capture it. Gen has more "metallic blue" in it that pops where the Gen is very flat and lifeless.
- Subdial color on Gen is gray. Rep subdials are black (i'm assuming they are reusing from the Black model).
- Lume application on the Rep isn't perfect and runs over some of the white edges on the indicies.
- Top pusher for chronograph gets stuck and doesn't return. Have to pull up to stop/reset.
- 6 o'clock tick mark in between swiss made is short compared to Gen dial.
Overall it is still NWBIG as without a side by side you wouldn't notice any difference.
Good:
- Case/caseback size, shape, finishing. Gen Ti case looks nearly identical to SS case on rep.
- Lume is actually pretty comparable to Gen.
- Subdial printing is correct with no major issues.
- Crystal shape & A/R very similar.
Issues:
- Dial color really is different. Tried to capture it. Gen has more "metallic blue" in it that pops where the Gen is very flat and lifeless.
- Subdial color on Gen is gray. Rep subdials are black (i'm assuming they are reusing from the Black model).
- Lume application on the Rep isn't perfect and runs over some of the white edges on the indicies.
- Top pusher for chronograph gets stuck and doesn't return. Have to pull up to stop/reset.
- 6 o'clock tick mark in between swiss made is short compared to Gen dial.
Overall it is still NWBIG as without a side by side you wouldn't notice any difference.