• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

flextime

You're Saying I Can Sell?
22/3/20
74
74
18
The 5 digit sub is one of my favorite reference. So much so, that I bought a bunch of Kermits from different factories and did a comparison to see 'who da best'. Here, we have the ARF, JF and BP (all stock at the moment) for comparison. Absent is a gen or a TC.
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

ARF - JF - BP

Availability

The ARF and the BP are the only models available from TDs currently. The ARF is currently listed by TDs for $488, making it the most costly of the bunch. The JF can still be found via M2M/BST every once in a while for $350-400 (unmodded). The BP comes with a SA3135 or an A2836. For this comparison, we have the SA3135, which has the correct date window location and crown height. The BP 3135 is currently on special for $228, normally $308.

ARF

Overall, the ARF is a great rep and the most gen-like option available, today. With a little franken, the ARF is a very satisfying watch.

The major issue is the datewheel font being too thicc and the font being wrong. This has been discussed at length by others, so just change the DW for a gen, or swap out the entire movement for a VR or VS3135. The SH3135 isn't bad at all, mine has issue and it's just easier to do a swap and fix the dw and movement at once.

The insert is actually quite good. The green is very vibrant and looks closest to the B4 insert. If you can get a gen (about $400), do so. If not, I think it's fine.

The rehaut looks fine from the naked eye, but it doesn't stand a chance if you do a side by side comparison with a gen.

The ARF bracelet is quite good, especially compared to the BP. The solid endlinks has no gaps, but the recess is not great, especially on the bottom right at 5 o'clock. SEL is an issue across the board here.

The dial looks decent. The print could be whiter, but without doing a side by side, you're not going to notice that. The lume (in daylight) on these are apparently too creamy compared to gen. But since I don't have one to compare, I'm going to say it's fine as well. If you get a gen dial, make sure you get gen hands as well. Mismatch lume is the worst!

JF

The JF is my favorite out of the box. From my research, JF and ARF is the same factory and the main difference here is that ARF uses 904L and JF uses 316L steel. I suspect anyone looking for a 5-digit would want to franken it. In which case, you can pick up an ARF as your base.

The datewheel isn't bad on this, although it's still a little on the thicker side. From the gen photos available online, it doesn't look that off. So I'm going to say it's acceptable, but should be changed if franken. The older SH3135 are noticeably less smooth. So, if you re opening it up, a VS or VR movement swap would be my move.

The insert on the JF is actually my favorite and it's entirely a judgement call. I just happen to like the darker green that looks metallic black at certain angle. It's very cool, but photos doesn't do it justice.

The bracelet feels similar to the ARF. The clasp is a little tight, but it could be due to wear from previous owner. The SEL on the JF is the best of the bunch, but that isn't saying much. It's basically the best of the worst. They all suck. This one just suck less.

Same issue with the rehaut for the JF, although I feel like this is slightly crisper or 'less suck' than the ARF and BP.

BP

The BP, while a bargain, has some major flaws -- bezel, insert, lugs, case, bracelet and dial -- that's hard to look past. I knew going in that the BP isn't gen instruction, especially the bezel assembly, which means that you can't do an insert swap.

The insert green is closest to the B3 lime variant. The color isn't bad, but it's not for me. The number on the bezel is smaller, leaving a noticeable gap between the bezel ring and the crystal.

The lugs have these aggressive chamfers that's very hard to ignore. The case looks to be a different size (I ordered a caliper, but it's not here yet), but to the naked eye, you can see the difference.

The bracelet is much lighter than the ARF and JF, and it feels cheap by comparison. It lacks heft, and the hallow midlinks are probably thinner and the other links may not be solid. The SEL is the worst of the bunch, and sits completely flushed to the lugs. The clasp is actually ok.

The dial was said to be the best of the bunch, based on a few comments in the forums. I couldn't definitely say why it was said to be better. But from what I was able to gather, the lume on the BP is whiter during daylight. Again, this is something I cannot confirm. What I can confirm is that the print on the dial is, unlike the rest. Especially the "1000 ft = 300m" line. You'll notice in the photos below that the spacing, kerning, typeface are different than gen or the other two. From what I've gathered, the BP dial is based on a D6 serviced dial.

Here are some comparison photos:
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

ARF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

JF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

BP
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

Gen (taken from Christie's)



r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

ARF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

JF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

BP
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

Gen (taken from Christie's)



r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

ARF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

JF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

BP



r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

ARF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

JF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

BP



r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

ARF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

JF
r/RepTime - Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP

BP

Final thoughts

Like any reps, all three Kermits has their flaws. To make a decent 5-digit Kermit, you really need to do some light frankening, specifically the DW (or movement) is a must. For those seeking closer to perfection, the insert, dial, hands, and bracelet would need to be changed.

I went into this really wanting to like the BP as the good-enough option, especially for the price. Given its limitations, it's really not worth modding. But the flaws listed is just too great for me to ignore. If you want a 5 digit kermit, the ARF is the only way to go, if buying from a TD.
 

brud

Horology Curious
24/7/16
13
2
3
Canada
Thank you for this comp! Have only recently caught the 5-digit Kermit bug and this seals the deal I think.

Sent from my SM-N975W using Tapatalk
 

SuperLory

Well-Known Repist
22/10/15
8,436
4,996
113
i have an ARF with VR3135 and it's really value for money
 

Spoons

Active Member
Patron
Certified
21/4/19
426
371
63
The hour hand on the BP is totally inexcusable.
 

p0pperini

patr0n h0arder
Gold Patron
Certified
29/1/19
9,002
30,293
113
UK
flextime Thanks for taking the time to post this excellent, detailed review. It’ll be really helpful to anyone looking at the Kermit options out there. 5 digit fans UNITE! :)
 

SHB

Mythical Poster
31/10/18
6,361
2,700
113
Earth
Nice review, thanks for taking time to do such post :)
 

flextime

You're Saying I Can Sell?
22/3/20
74
74
18
flextime Thanks for taking the time to post this excellent, detailed review. It’ll be really helpful to anyone looking at the Kermit options out there. 5 digit fans UNITE! :)

Thank you. Your posts on the 5 digit subs were an inspiration. I’ve gotten so much helpful information here and thought I’d give back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: p0pperini

Manuel.b

Renowned Member
15/1/21
822
461
63
Italia
Great review/comparison!
Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with us. Much appreciated!
 

m5smg2

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Certified
23/8/07
6,154
7,977
113
Thanks for the great review and photos. Easy solution for the rehaut engravings: don’t get them ;)

Would you please also post pics of the 3 clasps. Thanks.
 

mari115

Put Some Respect On My Name
9/6/18
4,439
2,478
113
Nearer than you think
Thanks for the review! You were lucky with that ARF, it's half decent, the ones i saw had problems with their bezel action, badly misaligned pearls and indices (i'm not mentioning the DW because it's just plain trash).

Arf is so annoying, they are basically making you pay 100 more dollars for the same watch (jf) but made worse lmaoooooo
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Tekumseh

McPwn

Active Member
21/9/20
291
116
43
Can you compare the CG's? Looking at TD pics, I thought the BP might actually have the most accurate CG's. On trustytime, the description for the BP was saying the case was like 1:1 with gen, most accurate, yada yada yada...
 

flextime

You're Saying I Can Sell?
22/3/20
74
74
18
I’ll take some more photos later of the clasp and crown guard.

As for the CG, I really don’t know how to evaluate them. Any particularities I should look for?
 

KJ2020

Time Traveler
Supporter
Top Poster Of Month
12/3/18
32,925
59,656
113
I’ll take some more photos later of the clasp and crown guard.

As for the CG, I really don’t know how to evaluate them. Any particularities I should look for?

Take multiple pics from various angles - top view, front view, side view, angled views. ARFs CGs have often been a focal point of dissatisfaction, as they are short and skinny. You might get some pic ideas from my BP 16710 review. Thanks for your review posted here, though I think you were a little too hard on the BP. If you just want a good beater that comes pretty close to the real thing for not a lot a lot of cash, it scratches the itch pretty well for some of us.

16710 BP vs Gen

16162592976551.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: wisedennis

flextime

You're Saying I Can Sell?
22/3/20
74
74
18
Deleted. Double post because of Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

flextime

You're Saying I Can Sell?
22/3/20
74
74
18
Yep, the crown guards on the ARF and JF are like a little teapot: short and stout.

BP

JF

ARF


BP

JF

ARF

BP

JF

ARF
 

flextime

You're Saying I Can Sell?
22/3/20
74
74
18
though I think you were a little too hard on the BP. If you just want a good beater that comes pretty close to the real thing for not a lot a lot of cash, it scratches the itch pretty well for some of us.

You may be right. The BP does scratch that itch for the price. An ARF LV with a replacement DW can get you 3 BPs.
 

p0pperini

patr0n h0arder
Gold Patron
Certified
29/1/19
9,002
30,293
113
UK
On trustytime, the description for the BP was saying the case was like 1:1 with gen, most accurate, yada yada yada...
Trusty's site repeats the factory's marketing nonsense about every watch - it rarely actually means anything.

However, that's not to criticise the BP, which - as Kj2020 says above - is an excellent rep, great value for money and a very decent approximation that's as good if not better in some regards than the more expensive offerings. The dial printing is very crisp. The insert colour is great (I preferred it to the JF). And the CGs may well be better than the others (but I don't own one any more, so can't make an in-hand comparison of them).
 

flextime

You're Saying I Can Sell?
22/3/20
74
74
18
The dial printing is very crisp.

Thank you p0perini and KJ2020 for coming to the BP’s defense.

I’m curious to hear your take on the font type on the BP dial, particularly the “1000 ft = 300 m” line. At first, I thought it was a factory error, but it looks like this was based on a D6 serviced dial from one source that I was able to find. I cannot confirm this and haven’t been able to find another photo of the Kermit using this “D6” dial.