ZF has engraved text on the bridges on the movement. APSF has the text silk screened (printed with ink) onto the bridges. The gen is obviously engraved, so you’d think the ZF would be the smart choice. But I’ve recently been examining the detritus at the bottom of my pre-cleaning watch glass and I’ve found that many of the movements in our reps come contaminated with engraving dust (metal swarf).
Note: the picture above is the debris I washed off a brand new DD3285 in a Clean GMT. I have no idea if ZF is better at keeping their assembly areas clean. But the fact that APSF prints the text and ZF engraves the text implies that this movement (like all clones) is manufactured “sterile” and is finished by the rep factories. While silk screen printing is obviously not gen-spec, it might come with the advantage of not fouling the movement with metal dust.
I wonder how much of the poor reputation for reliability this JLC movement has comes from a batch of these movements that got very dirty during assembly at ZF.