• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

HBB : comparison between V1 & V2 (modem burner)

Pix

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Advisor
Certified
22/12/06
8,536
1,750
113
FR
Hi Folks,

I have been delivered today with the Watchmark version (the 405 USD one). I must confess that this watch is not for me, but for a good friend of mine. But I'll keep it until sunday, so please feel free to ask any question.

I'm starting this thread not to make a review against the gen (experts please chime in if there are obvious points to be mentionned), but to compare what I have come to call the V1 against the V2.

V1 stands for the manufacturer1 version, i.e. the one we have all known. Although my V1 was a lite version, I consider it as being the same as far as the construction is concerned. The differences were :
- no AR coating, which was fixed afterwards with a Jakub's Ar coating
- 21,6 kbph movement against 28,8 kbph
- smooth SS PVD coated bezel against knurled ceramic. I have upgraded to a SS PVD coated knurled one thanks to UB7
My V1 is the SS version.

V2 stands for manufacturer2 version. It is commonly admitted that this is a rep of the rep. Due to a price which is higher than the lite version (that BTW seem to have disappeared) but lower, much lower than the "plain version", the big question is : "how does it stand" against the expensive one ?
The V2 is the RG version.

The answer (hopefully) in pictures is about to follow.

For me, the main difference (except of course the movement) comes from the strap, as for the rest, we're only speaking of details.
Why the strap ?
It's actually a much softer rubber, which IMO feels cheaper. It's fortunately not the extremely cheap rubber we can see on some Omega PO or on the Chopard GTXL. From what I have experienced today, it takes dust inside, but the outside (maybe thanks to its shape) does not attract dust, at least not much. So most of us will live with this, I'm sure. The most demanding buyers will be able to upgrade to the stiff version for less than 40 USD, as far as I recall Angus prices (who seem to be the only one selling spare parts). Also the V2 version looks absolutely matt, against a satin (almost glossy) finish for the V2.
Honestly I prefer the V1 finish, although noone would really notice the thing if they did not have both ones side by side.
I leave it to you for judging from pics.

01strapsrq0.jpg


Here you can see the dust inside and the softness of the V2.
02strapsinsidemp3.jpg


The embossed markings inside are better on the V1.
03strapinsidev1nr6.jpg

04strapinsidev2jx6.jpg


A side by side. The second one is something I usually don't do : using the flashlight. But I tought it gives an idea of the AR coating. The V2 has an AR which is hardly noticeable. But it exists : I particularly noticed it when I put water on the dial (to check it's sapphire, and it IS). There, the typical blue hue appeared. I would tend to say it's a single AR coating, but actually am unable to prove that. There you'll also see that the dust does not affect the outside of both straps. That's good to know for those who, like me, hate cheap straps.
05frontstz0.jpg

06frontsflashyq3.jpg


Caseback markings look both good. I'm not mentionning the contents, as it seems there are different markings according to the versions.
The V1 has stickers on the rotor, whereas the V2 has real engraving, which feels a bit more like the gen, but before all will avoid dramas with letters falling in the movement.
07casebackv1vj8.jpg

07casebackv2uq4.jpg


Deployment clasps are almost identical. The markings on the V2 are bolder, somehow not as well finished than on the V1. But still more than acceptable. I have the feeling that the V2 digs less in the wrist, but that might be an effect of the softer strap.
08bucklesfrontmq3.jpg

08bucklesls0.jpg


Sides look absolutely the same to me, except the crown logo which is bolder on the V2. The V2 has no screw-down crown, it is the same standard system as on the V1 : pull-out, push-in :lol: Looks slightly different in the construction.
09sideszi7.jpg

10sides2nv5.jpg

13crownv1uf8.jpg

14crownv2st2.jpg

11crownclosedv1uv1.jpg

12crownclosedv2ct4.jpg


It has been also said that there's a pattern difference in the V2's dial. It's true. The pattern in the small squares is less marked, but does exist. I must say you can't notice that by naked eyes. (both pictures are from V2)
16dialv2yw7.jpg

15dialpatternv2nl7.jpg


Last difference which is in favour of the V2 IMO : looks like a tiny detail, but it's an automatic tell for those knowing the 7750 movement. Look at the rotor screw of the V2 : it's smooth, which feels more like the gen.
17rotorscrewv1yi2.jpg

18rotorscrewv2nj4.jpg


Conclusion : Those having paid a lot for the "plain" V1 version did not pay for nothing. It's surely the best version around. However, we have an excellent alternative for those willing to pay a more "common" price.
I forgot something : the bezel.
Impossible for me to say if it's PVD coated steel or ceramic. Actually the screws are not the same exactly and I could not use my tool to detach the bezel. I have unscrewed one screw : looks grey inside, but I'm unable to say if it's the grey of the steel, or the grey of raw drilled ceramic. Also, the screws of V1 simply won't fit in V2. Be carefull if you have to change one (i.e. order from Angus)
Honestly, I don't think it's that important.


An other Version has popped up recently, it's Silix's one. Basically it is the V2 with a different bezel (looks wrong as it's flat). It has the high beat movement. No idea about the quality of the strap. It stands between Watchmark's version and the V1 we know. I tend to believe that it's a special manufacturing or modding done for or by Silix, as I don't think there's a 3rd manufacturer around. Until proven ;)


Hope that was useful.
 

dave123

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
20/3/07
1,313
3
0
Thats the $405 rose gold one?....looks like a good deal from your pics.....

Nicely done my friend,enjoyed reading it..... 8)
 

Pix

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Advisor
Certified
22/12/06
8,536
1,750
113
FR
Thx both :D
Yes, that's the 405 USD RG version.
 

mumum

Renowned Member
18/1/07
552
101
43
Nice detaied review. One of the better ones.
Would you be able to tell who carries this V2? The price is more thn worth it for the small difference. And with an upgraded strap. I think this is the better one.
 

Pix

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Advisor
Certified
22/12/06
8,536
1,750
113
FR
Thx.
I bought it from Watchmark, dealer on RWG. He actually has his own webstore : timesshop.net...
 

Pix

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Advisor
Certified
22/12/06
8,536
1,750
113
FR
As far as I understand NO, there are hands matters. But it's a direct swap against the Swiss 7750.

I'd like to cut the negative ideas about the low beat A7750, which actually looks more genuine than the high-beat.
Here are the pro & cons of both movements, as described by Ziggy on RWG

The "MYTH" or Misconception that a Asian 7750 21.6K slow beat model is "crappy" is just that - a misconception and incorrect. I say this from hands on experience with the actual movements.

Both the 21.6k and 28.8k Asian 7750's have problems and issues as delivered. What was a weak point on the 21.6k model has been corrected on the 28.8k movement, but what was a strong point on the 21.6k model - has become a weak one on the 28.8k model. So they both have flaws, but one is considered "good" and the other "crap"??

The older 21.6k Asian 7750 got a bad rap and continues to have this bad rap, quite undeservingly I think.



Old A7750 21.6k weak points
:

Dirty
Needs servicing
Fine regulator doesn't work
Cannon pin gear loose not enough friction
Hairsprings can be out of round and not concentric (even spacing between all the coils)
Finish of the movement poor, it doesn't look nice

New A7750 28.8k weak points:

Mainspring and barrel and winding gear soaked in silicone type of oil/grease
Pallet stones loose
Pallet stones not positioned correctly, not enough engagement into the escape wheel causing running problems
Cannon pin gear loose and not enough friction



The old 7750 has the same subdial and chrono hand sizes (the hour and minute hands are the same size on all models). So if you want to install a ETA, having the older 21.6k model is straight forward.

The new 7750 has different hand sizes than the ETA, the subdial and choro ones are all 0.20mm, so you need to make the subdial ones fit the ETA (0.17mm on the ETA) and you need to make the center seconds fit as well (0.25mm on the ETA).

BUT, I have been seeing many new A7750's that have old and new part on them...so it's anybody's guess what you will get. I have seen at least 5 or more different versions of the new 7750 alone...they are all different...



It is a mix of new and old parts, some of the new ones have 0.17mm subdial sizes, and 0.20 seconds hand size, others are all 0.20mm size, some have old bridges with the crappy finish, others have the new ones, some have no fine regulator on the balance, some have a fine regulator, etc...it's all over the place. But the problems are the same on all models...

RG
 

guanaco

Mythical Poster
Advisor
16/7/07
6,654
12
38
Sidi Power Plant
Thx for the info. Pix, very eye opening! So, what type of Swiss movement does the HBB rep take? 7750 or 7753? :| Sorry I' have no knowledge on the HBB.
 

Pix

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Advisor
Certified
22/12/06
8,536
1,750
113
FR
Well, looking at the subdials placement and date, I would say 7750. Actually I'm not sure that the only diffeence between the 7750 and 7753 are only the layout. So better to have this double-confirmed.
 

pirvan

Known Member
9/11/06
144
0
0
I was a owner of the HBB V1, steel with CF dial and polished ceramic. With double AR (chinese made).

A few days ago I went into an AD. They have:

- HBB steel case + ceramic bezel + CF dial (exactly the same as my rep)
- Ice bang
- All steel
- Frapuccino
- All white model (I don0t know the correct name now)

What I saw:

- The strap in the gen is SOOOOOO SOFT.
- The gen HAS NO BLUE AR. I repeat: NO BLUE AR. The steel + ceramic = NO BLUE AR. All steel: NO BLUE AR, Frapuccino: NO BLUE AR. Ice bang: NO BLUE AR.
- The CF dial of the rep SUCKS. No words in the gen dial, awesome.

I sold my HBB. Now a dewitt is coming ;)

EDIT: "blue" AR
 

Balosch

Known Member
1/2/08
193
0
0
I read somewhere on the Hublot-site:

"Crystal Sapphire with interior anti-reflection treatment"

Does that mean Ar only on the inside???
 

Pix

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Advisor
Certified
22/12/06
8,536
1,750
113
FR
Yes, this is what I understand.

And you'll be lucky with the V2, as the blue hue we're all looking for is hardly noticeable :)

Also, the strap is soft :lol: But I don't like it, I prefer the V1 semi-stiff version by far.
 

doctorron

I'm Pretty Popular
5/3/07
2,109
2
0
Man, Pix. Fine job. I hope I can pipe in a bit more when I have time.
 

Hambone

Banned member, the goat does not approve
Banned
24/11/06
2,639
1
0
Superb comparison Pix. It is a good thing that the V2 is available for those who won't pay the higher price for the V1. My V1 has served me well and the ceramic bezel is one of the outstanding features of the watch. It surprises me that you mention it is difficult to tell the difference between the ceramic and PVD. That being the case makes the v2 all the more desirable.
 

deff23

You're Saying I Can Sell?
DO NOT TRADE WITH ME
12/4/08
46
0
0
Fantastic work, I am just about to pull the trigger on one of these and this helped a lot
 

Pix

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Advisor
Certified
22/12/06
8,536
1,750
113
FR
Thx both :D
Hambone : in fact I'm afraid I am the problem in recognizing the ceramic :oops: What I saw is something greyish, and I really have doubts how black unpolished (raw?) ceramic should look like.
 

evildee

Active Member
13/9/06
432
0
0
I just received mine. Everything looks good!!!!!

EXCEPT the rehault. Damn!

I did not notice in those pics. Double Damn!!! :oops:

I'm cool with it considering it's the lowest priced version.
 

Pix

Mythical Poster
Supporter
Advisor
Certified
22/12/06
8,536
1,750
113
FR
To make it clear : the rehault is silver, whereas it should be gold.