It's not about humour, we have a lot here, go reading any nuked sales thread. It's about broken Ensligh and bad Goole Translate.
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
Genuine new Daytona 126519 appreciation
- Thread starter CTime
- Start date
DoctorStMoritz
Known Member
I am not using Google Translate and my English is not broken.
I do not understand why the last posts I wrote make so much fuss.
I am entitled to exchange if it stays professional - which I try to do because I respect a lot this community - and on the subject. Let's keep it this way.
Peace.
DoctorStMoritz
Known Member
I always try to keep it all professional and not fool around. I never use offensive language like "crazy", "insane", "out of your mind" etc. It's never productive for the community and, frankly, I don't see how anyone could use it on the basis of forum posts that are neither offensive, inflammatory or on topic. Do not be offended and do not reply if you feel even slightly offended. I am not Madame Blavatsky either. Greetings to you all, friends.
Just leave good enough alone bro. We've already went off topic enough.
Let's get back to this beautiful thread we have.
You think that's bad, but nobody mentions the really messed up paint job on the hour hand??
99% of you would red light a watch with hands like that.
mmaggi
Renowned Member
Well... If you need 25x magnification to see a fault....
Am fine with this for now, as it's more like a prototype, but you are right, will RL it if it's QC photos.You think that's bad, but nobody mentions the really messed up paint job on the hour hand??
99% of you would red light a watch with hands like that.
- 16/2/16
- 1,216
- 611
- 113
Don't expect perfection from Rolex, you won't find it 
there are too many flaws when you look closely. Especially with latest productions.
RSC offered me a dial change for my old 16613 because of some hairline stratches that can only be seen under 20x loupe that happened in previous non-RSC service. My other 16613 is almost perfect.
BUT there are ton of hairline stratches on my new 126613 dial and hands under same loupe that i got directly from AD, out of factory.
there are too many flaws when you look closely. Especially with latest productions.RSC offered me a dial change for my old 16613 because of some hairline stratches that can only be seen under 20x loupe that happened in previous non-RSC service. My other 16613 is almost perfect.
BUT there are ton of hairline stratches on my new 126613 dial and hands under same loupe that i got directly from AD, out of factory.
- 21/3/14
- 5,856
- 685
- 113
Let me put it this way.
Rolex does not need any colab nowadays.
Rolex probably does not want colabs as not even T&Co are currently available for Rolex.
So Swatch… Seriously? Rolex is not even a swatch group brand. Would Apple colab with Samsung ?
If I would take it seriously, this is how it would go.
Oh another swatch colab ? Great
First omega, then Blancpain, now what Breguett?, HWinston, Longiness or my personal favourite a Hamilton Swatch with a bad ass really affordable bellow 100usd great watch.
Rolex ? Nope, it’s not even funny to me.
Just brings the quality of comments in this forum a bit down imho, and Im not even a Rolex vain fanatic. Bs… sorry
@CTime
Get me in that waiting list for the first rep of this watch that actually arrives.
Take my money for it please
Get me in that waiting list for the first rep of this watch that actually arrives.
Take my money for it please