Hi all - I'm new to the rep community, but have done, what I feel like, is a considerable amount of research and learning. RWI has been a great tool, and I'm super appreciative of all the knowledge stored here.
At some point, I saw mention of a "floating m." I conducted my own research, and it sounds like the floating m is considered a rep flaw. With that said, I've seen several watches being sold as genuine with card/papers (primarily on Moda Watch Club) that have the floating m. I've noticed that it's primarily the 114060 no-date, and some have a floating m while others don't.
My question / topic of discussion is this: If even gen's have a floating m, is it your opinion that this is truly a flaw? I can't see a world where something is a flaw if it's possible for a gen to also have it, similar to slight rehaut misalignment.
I've attached a few pics of 114060's advertised as gen for your viewing pleasure.
Curious to hear thoughts and hope you guys see this worthy of conversation.
At some point, I saw mention of a "floating m." I conducted my own research, and it sounds like the floating m is considered a rep flaw. With that said, I've seen several watches being sold as genuine with card/papers (primarily on Moda Watch Club) that have the floating m. I've noticed that it's primarily the 114060 no-date, and some have a floating m while others don't.
My question / topic of discussion is this: If even gen's have a floating m, is it your opinion that this is truly a flaw? I can't see a world where something is a flaw if it's possible for a gen to also have it, similar to slight rehaut misalignment.
I've attached a few pics of 114060's advertised as gen for your viewing pleasure.
Curious to hear thoughts and hope you guys see this worthy of conversation.

