Daytona Appreciation - Post Your Daytona Pics & Opinion

[m5smg2]

 

[m5smg2]

Actually the noticeable difference between the black 520 and 500 dials is the sheen of the sub dials. The steel bezel 520 has very shiny mirror like sub dial rings. The ceramic bezel 500 sub dials are very matte.

 

[Bobi01]

Isnt the dial on arf too white and too matte compared to gen?

 

[srhoque]

Hi mate, thanks
yes its 116520 dial, i also have gen 116520 bezel, but i prefer the ceramic looks.
more handsome LOL

This is the actual look

True, the black is close...so interchangeable. Frankly, I like the looks that you have on ceramic better. It is much easier to maintain. I also have a bunch of gen SS bezels and they scratch all the time.

BTW, the main reason I asked my question originally was I was trying to find to a place about where to source a gen 116500 black dial

 

[WenR]

True, the black is close...so interchangeable. Frankly, I like the looks that you have on ceramic better. It is much easier to maintain. I also have a bunch of gen SS bezels and they scratch all the time.

BTW, the main reason I asked my question originally was I was trying to find to a place about where to source a gen 116500 black dial

I will inform you when i have received mine, ordered Gen white dial 116500 and Gen bezel 116500.
i hope i dont get cheat, LOL...

 

[srhoque]

Isnt the dial on arf too white and too matte compared to gen?

A friend of mine has a gen (I see it all the time) and I have the ARF. Frankly, they are very close with regards to the Matte finish and no sunburst.

The only issue with ARF...as you know the outer border of the sub-dials have shiny paint on them and that shiny ring goes around the whole outer circle. When sun light hits it directly, the shine makes the ARF sub dials seem a tad bit thicker. The gen dial doesn’t do this. Indoors (without direct sunlight hitting the dials), both look alike.

 

[wubsub]

 

[cassapanca]

Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk

 

[Luxus564]

Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

 

[M Scott]

A friend of mine has a gen (I see it all the time) and I have the ARF. Frankly, they are very close with regards to the Matte finish and no sunburst.

The only issue with ARF...as you know the outer border of the sub-dials have shiny paint on them and that shiny ring goes around the whole outer circle. When sun light hits it directly, the shine makes the ARF sub dials seem a tad bit thicker. The gen dial doesn’t do this. Indoors (without direct sunlight hitting the dials), both look alike.

Others who have who have compared these Black Dials in person have given a very similar description of the differences.

 

[sputim]

WIP..stay tuned

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[MrBeasy]

Franken Panda.

Probably only a handful of these around...

 

[MrBeasy]

Franken Panda.

Probably only a handful of these around...

Better quality pic.

 

[ssouthall6]

A friend of mine has a gen (I see it all the time) and I have the ARF. Frankly, they are very close with regards to the Matte finish and no sunburst.

The only issue with ARF...as you know the outer border of the sub-dials have shiny paint on them and that shiny ring goes around the whole outer circle. When sun light hits it directly, the shine makes the ARF sub dials seem a tad bit thicker. The gen dial doesn’t do this. Indoors (without direct sunlight hitting the dials), both look alike.

Thank you for backing up what I've been saying since noob released the v1!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[WenR]

 

[m5smg2]

 

[James2020]

Nice shots. Gen or franken piece?

 

[m5smg2]

Nice shots. Gen or franken piece?

Thanks. Both Noob with ARF dial, CF bezel, Prof crystal.

 

[tenx139]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[mclarendude]

You know what? I rather like it.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk