@Tony Clifton The 116519ln was my very first rep and first introduction to the rep game. As you mentioned it is stunning, ever since ive had it I cant stop looking at it!!
With respect to the flaw you are referng to, I see it and i dont in my dial relative to gen or what I think are gen dials.
Let me try and explain, I have the v3 and the "o" doesnt seem to be as perfectly round, its ever so slightly thicker on the right side bottom.
I've tried to compare images of my dial, with numerous gen, or what i believe are gen, images from google/ insta.
The results ive found to be inconclusive regarding the flaw, meaning relative to most images it seems to be almost no different. I was wondering if anyone has had the same exerperience. Could it be they fixed the printing in the v3??
Oops, just saw dharma s comparison, and seems hes reached a similar conclusion!
Here are some photographs of 116519 dials in close up, all taken under identical lighting conditions
First up, a genuine Rolex dial photographed in free air
Next, an earlier generation Noob dial (probably v2) photographed installed under crystal
And finally, the current Noob v3 dial, again photographed installed under crystal
There's quite a difference in close up but the differences are barely noticeable to the human eye. Rather like the white dials, the Noob v3 dial looks like a step backward compared with the earlier version.