markfisher
Active Member
If crystal is the same but bezel angle is different then rehault
must be different (higher) on Noob...
must be different (higher) on Noob...
You are right, the gen looks like the sels were "forced" in and not flush. I looked at some gen pics on chrono24 and some are flush, some are not like mine. BAD QC?
Yours look better from the front I guess it doesn't really matter. Ive owned my gen 7 years now and there is a tiny tiny gap in the sel. When I have it polished my jeweller tightens them up but I try not to get it done too often.
Yes, there seem to be a little gap between the SEL and the case, but very little.
Hello, took some pictures today. Sorry for the dirt and fingerprints, i realized today that i should clean them every once in a while White is noob v2. Black is 2015/2016 gen .
At a glance, dial print is off on the noob. Notably OYSTER PERPETUAL and dull DAYTONA lettering. Hands are flat. Bezel font is thinnier but close. Subdials are very close. Markers looks the same to me.
SEL protrudes from case. Crystal looks the same.
Closeup of dial
SIDE SHOT
GEN
NOOB
Gen bezel is more flat. My ARF 116520 is closer than the noob. Not noticeable on the wrist.
Bezel, crystal, sel
GEN
NOOB
SEL is recessed and with no gaps on gen watch. Noob is bad. pushers looks the same to me. Crystal is really close. Bezel is definetely more angled on the noob. Bezel numbers are really not noticeable.
another side shot
BACK
GEN
NOOB
Noob caseback is totally wrong. Grooves are way too small. SEL middle link curve is wrong. Gen sel don't sits flush to the back of the case, with no gaps.
SIDE shot
GEN
NOOB
Looks somewhat different. My ARF is closer. Crystal height is the same.
Conclusion:
I do like the V2 daytona, all the flaws are practically invisible on the wrist, the movement is really good, v2 dial is 80% good to me, it could pass for one of the many dial variations, please note gen is 1 tick noob is 2 tick. SEL is a disaster, My arf is way better. Bezel could be better, i'm sure they will fix it soon, as the small dial flaws.
I am just wondering if the genuine Rolex spring bar helps on minimizing the sel gap or not? Thanks.
Gen Springbars don‘t help, they are 2 mm and noob /ARF are using 1.78 mm You can mod the hole to 2.0 mm or buy Swiss 1.78 mm Springbars.
Sent from my iPad with Tapatalk
I ABSOLUTELY LOVE the guys who bitch about the flaws for $700. Yes $700 is somebody's car payment it or house payment. But the gen is $14,000 used, $21,000 new
Does it have flaws? Yep. Some of them bug me. The dial is my biggest peeve. The subdials lack the pop of the gen. But what makes this watch worth every penny is the magical 4130 that they reverse engineered. That alone is worth the price of the watch.
Yet people proudly wear their noob 116610 with the 2836 that has obvious crown guard flaws, the crowns are too low, the LV model has that green dial that comes nowhere near the pop of brilliance of the gen and the movement turns backward to adjust time. Yet they complain about what is likely the most difficult Rolex to replicate.
This is a perfect platform for a grail franken build. Gen dial, bezel, hands, crystal, gasket, movement service, crown, plungers and adequate waterproofing. It won't be cheap, but it'd be stunning.
So, yes, it has flaws, but they're so subtle that no one will ever see them to call you out. I mix my gens and reps willy nilly randomly, and my Seiko 55 fathoms and SKX get the most wrist time.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
would be interested in a compare between the movements