Rusty_Shackleford
Getting To Know The Place
- 15/4/21
- 35
- 19
- 8
this fits the submariner 116610 also correct? This would be a good upgrade over the Clean Factory stock crystal?
Last edited:
-
Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!
CF Pepsi picture leaks BLRO
- Thread starter wolfiqar
- Start date
this fits the submariner 116610 also correct? This would be a good upgrade over the Clean Factory stock crystal?
BoobBandit
resident fallguy
@duckbers wife must have tiny pussy lips. Hence his lip psycosis. If he’s not a virgin that is . I’m just sayin.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
I don't even care about the lips too much, it's the doodoo stained insert that's my main issue
BoobBandit
resident fallguy
So this is how the conversation devolved huh, you went from literally lying about gens to feel better about your rep to calling people virgins haha
CF fanbase in a nutshell
Fervid
I'm Pretty Popular
Not the first time Duckber has come in here with nothing positive to add and thread-crapped instead.. For people enthusiastic about reps you sure behave like children.
BoobBandit
resident fallguy
In my defense, I had no idea who this nimrod was. Now I can ignore him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Is this the 5th time to quoted me just to ignore me and end the conversation now?
You know what screams panty dropper energy? Making up lies about the gen to fool people on an internet forum about how accurate your watch is.
I'm not sure why you have issue with my thoughts. I said the rep here is alright, even good in some aspects. It is just lacking in others. Constructive criticism is a positive thing IMO. I didn't call it a DHGate rep. If you don't like constructive criticism you can make your CF Pepsi subreddit or something and ban anyone who says anything negative about the watch.
- 12/3/18
- 34,664
- 66,756
- 113
I haven't seen the CF stock crystal bro but Clark's has no distortion at the edges like many rep crystals can have. The one with AR cyclops has no LEC, for anyone who didn't know. Clark just came out with one that does have LEC, but that one has no AR cyclops. The AR cyclops is a much preferred option IMO. I think eventually there will be one with both options. I never cared about LEC, many rep crystals have substandard ones.
The Clark's 295C crystals will fit 5 and 6 digit Subs, GMTs and YMs.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/255059526025?hash=item3b62bb8189:g:uKwAAOSwe7hg5iiM
This is another new listing, havent tried it but probably will. No LEC with full underside AR
https://www.ebay.com/itm/255037271356?epid=1764854788&hash=item3b6167ed3c:g:bvUAAOSwSspgg0gY
- 12/3/18
- 34,664
- 66,756
- 113
How’s that for visible?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Haha, nice one bro.
HauntedHat
Getting To Know The Place
- 23/8/18
- 71
- 8
- 8
I saw your previous posts recommending this crystal, but you got any pics of them installed in your watches? I'm looking for a replacement but I'd like to see them in context before wasting $50
The Clark is a great crystal, I’m interested in the new addition with AR underneath, as I understand the other one he sells is just an AR cyclops only?
I normally re-glue the cyclops anyway trying to use the most minimal amount of UV glue. Gen Rolex crystal cyclops’s are installed with a calculated amount of UV adhesive and there is a perfect radius of glue left around the cyclops edge where it meets the crystal… this actually contributes or creates the ‘halo’ effect. Rolex do not use a razor to clean off all excess glue.
Next time you have a loupe in your hand have a look at a new gen CAR crystal cyclops you’ll know what i mean
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I normally re-glue the cyclops anyway trying to use the most minimal amount of UV glue. Gen Rolex crystal cyclops’s are installed with a calculated amount of UV adhesive and there is a perfect radius of glue left around the cyclops edge where it meets the crystal… this actually contributes or creates the ‘halo’ effect. Rolex do not use a razor to clean off all excess glue.
Next time you have a loupe in your hand have a look at a new gen CAR crystal cyclops you’ll know what i mean
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
shamanblues999
Getting To Know The Place
- 25/4/18
- 71
- 47
- 0
Maybe not a Gen Xtal is needed. Now definitely interested in seeing a Clark's Xtal in of these, Anyone doing/done it?, please pics...
- 12/3/18
- 34,664
- 66,756
- 113
- 12/3/18
- 34,664
- 66,756
- 113
VSF has a better black hole effect, a little better AR.
But ithe VSF cyclops after the very first batch of LNs has edge distortion that bothers some more than others. Clark's have no distortion no matter the viewing angle
Last edited:
- 12/3/18
- 34,664
- 66,756
- 113
Here you can see the VSF does better at reducing the reflection in an almost identical lighting environment.
Anyone notice there’s no accessible pics of any of the BLRO’s on Jtime’s site anymore. Or am I the only one having this problem?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
