Yes, I heard about this a while ago.
As you can imagine, reasonable alternatives are either to use other movt., Or to allow them in other factories.
In the first case, many other changes in the models will be required, and this will require a lot of time and money; in the other case, these resources will be required even more, but at least we will get a chance to see these products in the form in which we bought not so long ago.
If the situation is really like that, then if we see the clones in a year or so, then this is a good alignment.
Well, or let's go back to the 7750 era.
However, just my thoughts on this matter.
I will add:
If for Daytona (as far as I know), the clone determines the correct thickness simultaneously with the functionality, and is the only solution so far, then in the case of PANERAI, this is not so critical. The era of the P.9000 model has passed, it was never a clone in the full sense, like the VSF caliber for Rolex, its thickness did not allow for the thickness of gen cases, and its appearance was not suitable for models with a transparent caseback. In the end, even the function of resetting the second hand to "0" at the second stop was not implemented.
VSF had to come up with something new anyway to match the new models to the fullest, and now they are freed from the only exploitable option.
Of course, their situation is difficult, but if they return to work, despite the absence of these clones, then future reps will have a chance to progress in quality.
Of course, there are PAM382, PAM438, PAM312 and some other eternal hits, which, most likely, under such circumstances, we will lose forever, but well ... A lot of new things are ahead.
Chronographs based on the P.9200, the slim OP.900 for example, and even last P.9010, will open the way for many new models, which will be more and more in the PAM lineup.