Anyone received QC for newly ordered PAM111N yet?

[brett sinclair]

Thanks for the inormation

I didn't buy the watch the guy proposed me of course, cause first I don't think he had the last version, and then because he didn't put this PAM in the sales section.
I am waiting for the one I've ordered from Angus, and yes you are right, the war has begunirates:

 

[WatchnScotch]

There are 111n that are not the latest version. I have a 111n from sead, got it like 3-4 months ago.

 

[ALE7575]

There are 111n that are not the latest version. I have a 111n from sead, got it like 3-4 months ago.

OMG! Naylor you seem a beginner! LOL
Don't be ingenous!
Read here:
http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/pam-v1-vs-109433?p=1076391
ALE

EDITED by ALE:
SORRY Naylor it was a misunderstanding. See post #30

 

[knight]

Seems like the V3 is never coming, TD just updated that there is no ETA still despite the factory is already back in operation... the wait has been tormenting...:suicide:

 

[inmotionnow]

I just try to keep it out of my mind for now... (Yet I'm still reading the forums every day to see if someone got new QC pics yet ha!)

 

[thran]

http://www.timesshop.net/

on their home page it states:
- Noobfactory Pam111 N in stock now only available with Black Rubber strap - Asian 6497 movement Immediate delivery! - updated 7th Aug.2012

At least its going in the right direction

 

[brett sinclair]

good news !

 

[ALE7575]

http://www.timesshop.net/

on their home page it states:
- Noobfactory Pam111 N in stock now only available with Black Rubber strap - Asian 6497 movement Immediate delivery! - updated 7th Aug.2012

At least its going in the right direction

good news !

Hi thran

Has someone sometime said: PATIENCE IS THE FIRST RULE IN THIS HOBBY?

But really it is always said: NEVER TRUST A REPLICA DEALER

ALE

 

[WatchnScotch]

OMG! Naylor you seem a beginner! LOL
Don't be ingenous!
Read here:
http://forum.replica-watch.info/vb/showthread.php/pam-v1-vs-109433?p=1076391
ALE

EDITED by ALE:
SORRY Naylor it was a misunderstanding. See post #30

I know Ale, I guess what I was saying didn't come through. What I meant was to respond to the person who was looking at the 111n from a member. Just a warning that you have to be careful

 

[ALE7575]

I know Ale, I guess what I was saying didn't come through. What I meant was to respond to the person who was looking at the 111n from a member. Just a warning that you have to be careful

Sorry Naylor I was wrongly understood your post !!
It is my mistake
Excuse me

ALE

 

[thran]

Hi thran

Has someone sometime said: PATIENCE IS THE FIRST RULE IN THIS HOBBY?

But really it is always said: NEVER TRUST A REPLICA DEALER

ALE

never trust a dealer?! then what do we do!?! :lol:

 

[brett sinclair]

Yes, sadly there are some people even here in rwi who try to take advantage of our frustration. I did write I 'd like to have Pam 111n in some posts and I received this Pm from this guy though I didn't ask anything. He registered here a while ago but still have the "who has the best sub" status... That's why I doubt about his "kindness".
Everyone be careful!

 

[levelmanroger]

never trust a dealer?! then what do we do!?! :lol:

You can trust a dealer on the basic things - like the watch is made of some metallic conglomeration which will at least strongly resemble stainless steel, and it will be extremely accurate at least twice a day.
But things like "waterproof", "serviced", "1:1", "made by dissecting a gen", "can deliver in 5 days", "is in stock", etc are all intended only to give you confidence and part you from your money. They beat little resemblance to truthful data more often than not.
That's not to say all rep watches and dealers are crap. That's only to say that you have to take the watch for its basics and not put any stock in statements beyond what you can see or others here have verified.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ALE7575]

You can trust a dealer on the basic things - like the watch is made of some metallic conglomeration which will at least strongly resemble stainless steel, and it will be extremely accurate at least twice a day.
But things like "waterproof", "serviced", "1:1", "made by dissecting a gen", "can deliver in 5 days", "is in stock", etc are all intended only to give you confidence and part you from your money. They beat little resemblance to truthful data more often than not.
That's not to say all rep watches and dealers are crap. That's only to say that you have to take the watch for its basics and not put any stock in statements beyond what you can see or others here have verified.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ah! What a pleasure hear commentst from a veteran !!
Level you are one of the best !!.... Umm... the best??

ALE

 

[thran]

You can trust a dealer on the basic things - like the watch is made of some metallic conglomeration which will at least strongly resemble stainless steel, and it will be extremely accurate at least twice a day.
But things like "waterproof", "serviced", "1:1", "made by dissecting a gen", "can deliver in 5 days", "is in stock", etc are all intended only to give you confidence and part you from your money. They beat little resemblance to truthful data more often than not.
That's not to say all rep watches and dealers are crap. That's only to say that you have to take the watch for its basics and not put any stock in statements beyond what you can see or others here have verified.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for the info, i figured that would be the case