Nice to see you posting again
Darkimplicates. My experience corresponds exactly, word for word, to what you say about the gen Diver cyclops and also the gen crystals. Indoors, in non-indirect low light, the gen Diver cyclops looks like it has 2AR. As far as inconsistent info, I am probably personally to blame: Noob V3.5 Diver was the second rep I bought many years ago, and I drummed its beat for many years, because I was kind of turned off by the generation wars that followed, and the Noob 3.5 dial was a milestone achievement in Diver reps, with all other JF dials still inferior to it by comparison. But my enlightenment came when a certain well-regarded member sent me both Noob and JF cases to choose from for his Franken, with gen dial, timing ring, and hands as part of the build. I had to choose, so I did my research, like you
FastPaced. The V7 case-set was chosen in the end. It is funny that now we are mentioning bezels, because I think most of the ROO rep bezels have gone un-examined: there is a really subtle difference between a gen bezel and a rep bezel, and none of the rep ROO bezels, whether Cer, and especially SS and Ti, really capture the geometry of the gen ROO bezel. The angles and dimensions are slightly different, but the end effect is very noticeable. Rolex guys with their keen eyes for lug geometry are much further ahead of us here in the AP forum: but the Rolex guys do not have to worry about color matching as much as we do.