Any obvious flaws for offshore T3?

[pureak]

I am so care about wrong position of date window of offshore, so I prefer to buy T3 version. Could anybody tell the flaws of T3 ultimate version? like this one

http://www.puretimewatch.com/product/royal-oak-offshore-ultimate-t3-terminator-3-grey-dial/

 

[nycreplica]

She's a beauty

 

[mactower]

Beautiful watch.

 

[Josh]

I could make love to that.

 

[PecMan]

well how many times do u c that watch even at the AD ! no worries about it and people doesnt even know what kind of watch is it or brand. if u like it buy it! it is really good
google some gen pics , compare and analize

 

[Indec]

This is the problem, no one knows the probable flaws of this watch. I've been on the market for it aswell but even the dealers told me it's not a super-rep. Wich is a shame really.

:-(

Love the bigger limited AP's.

 

[Heisenberg]

The T3 is calling for me too. I think this is an excellent rep, closer to the gen than many of the so-called 'Ultimate' or 'Super' versions I see. The crown guards and case look very good to me.

Here are the differences I notice from the gen:

Incorrect subdial hands - too thick, less shaping
Font for the Tachymetre too large, position of 'TACHYMETRE' label slightly off
Font for the subdials too large

There are plenty of photos of the gen on Google, Ebay, etc. If there are other major flaws I am overlooking please do point them out.

The only AP I currently have is the 'Ultimate' Survivor sec@12. Other than the date window position, that is an amazing rep and very solidly built. If the T3 comes from that factory I'm sure it is similarly good quality.

Here are a few pics for size comparison to the "small" ROO models

 

[audace]

Looks like it can survive a nuke, which it probably could.

 

[Darthmemnoch]

As would a seiko (survive being near a nuclear meltdown)

 

[alvinado]

it is from the same factory as the rest of the ap secs at 12