Devedander said:
I am sorry... I don't know how else to word it... going from 60 to 100 in 0 seconds simply means that you are now going 100... if you drive for 1 hour you will then have gone 100 mph...
If you recall you brought up complexities like accelerate and deceleration times etc... the instant accel is thrown in to simplify those out of the way and make it easy math...
I guess u guys aren't following me.
I took a theratical physics class, and we discussed this same type of accel, instant which would not cover distance, that's the angle I was looking at this problem from.
I see what pugs is saying, but I didn't see it that way with the wording.
if its assumed instant then no distance can be covered if there was no distance implied to begin with unless your implying a "lap" is a definitive distance..??
I hope you guys see what I'm talking about I hate to be stumped by these types of probs.