IMHO this rep is really very disappointing. The movement is just a decorated movement and the positions of bridges and plates are completely different. 5726 PPF in comparison is much much better and with all functions. Here we don't know if the chrono function is real or only small seconds, with fake buttons. I understand that it could be a first step, but there is already the ref. 5968 aquanaut chrono with the same movement. 2 mm thicker is really too Michel for the proportions of the case of this watch. I saw the 5968 rep OMF, really terrible, a metal box. Let's hope it's very successful and there are other versions. I won't take this one.
Up until the ppf v2 5712 it was only really the "date only" pateks that had "clone" movements, I'm not sure when a rep having a fully clone movement (especially a 5980 with a flyback chrono) became a minimum requirement, especially from a v.1. If someone is up close enough to see the movement of your watch and understands the intricacies of the movement enough to call you out on wrong bridge positions, They will know its a rep already...
The finishing for me will always the biggest tell on a rep movement, especially when comparing to the quality of Patek or AP. Agree with you on the case dimension, that 2mm additional thickness completely changes the silhouette of this watch. But again, for a v.1 of a watch that had never been repped by this factory before, its a decent base to work from. As with most reps for any improvements to be made Chinese factories need to see demand, so only way to improve this rep is by people buying it. Hopefully that happens!
Completely understand people being disappointed but I do think expectations have been skewed massively by the progress seen in particular references.