YES SIR!!!!!
[smilie=icon_bounce.gif]
Cucumber_Jones said:No fighing in my thread boys...
[smilie=icon_bounce.gif]
Cucumber_Jones said:No fighing in my thread boys...
enzo said:After you mentioned it, it was one of those things that I started to notice, because I knew it was there. So I thought I'd see how easy it was to do? I have done two and I can say it's easy if you just don't rush it. The amount of work involved is very minimal due to the little amount of material to remove. But you can tell the difference, once it's done.
I don't think I would go to the trouble to undo a complete watch and perform it. If the watch is unassembled, then, it's an easy added, attention step.
babola said:I was going to say that, as it was the very first thing I noticed...but you're never 100% with the pics, and noone has attempted (so far, anyway) that little mod ...devil's in the detail, as they say... 8)
Did my post from few weeks back contribute to your decision to attempt filing down the pin top at all ?
Finepics3 said:Oh dear I keep having a go at old Enzo - I don't mean to it's just that sometimes I feel that there are too many noobs around who shout out wow and amazing to stuff that's already been done a long time ago.
Anyway a lot of you might not have seen this thread on the RWG regarding CG's for the 5218's and H series - take a look:
http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=14488
Cucumber_Jones said:Ok boys - we are all friends here... Now lets get back to how sweet my wacth looks!!
enzo said:Here is a GEN that sold in 2004 for USD$12,305.00 ... look at the CG and crown vs the REP of CJs, I think the REP looks adjusted better!
ANOTHER tiny detail on the GEN, note the ends of the hands, the swords are dulled or rounded off ...
Cucumber_Jones said:I think it is the photo. These photos are always odd.