Nein...
What you mentioned (gen to gen) are such subtle differences *I* wouldn't complain...
Then again, I wouldn't accept these differences anyway in a watch that sells for $9500.00 (SRP)
What *I* mentioned (as far as reps of the DSSD go) you may not understand what I am saying..and what many have already stated in this thread....
The case is completely wrong.
You need a suitable platform in order to mod it...A proper foundation is a correct case (too thin) and
Correct bezel thickness, and rehaut depth (both are wrong)
I can actually live with a bezel insert that would be considered *less than ideal* in a replica watch....
But if the factories cannot even get the precision of the correct depth of the entire watch?
1.) I don't/I shouldn't have to buy a gen to be able to get such a detail "down pat"
2.) Rehaut, case and overall depth isn't very hard to do, considering such exquisite works of art that have come from these very same factories...
When you say:
So, what most of you complain about on your reps also happen in the real world of Rolex too. That is why is is hard to tell gens from reps..variations of the gens over the years and even within a few months of production. The watches are hand built so yes they can vary...
The thickness of the marker rings doesn't vary much if any.
In fact, this *variation* is one of the features that makes a genuine Rolex, a genuine Rolex. I've not seen such variations you've mentioned and I frequent Rolex AD's all of the time...
I doubt you read my post that mentions what I think should be made to exact specification as per gen, or close to it...(Among them, and repeated for you)
-Correct thickness of markers
-Correct thickness of bezel/case
-Bezel insert with a closer to gen pearl and correct thickness of the white numbers and marks
-( not to mention an ALIGNED PEARL! )
-Possibly correct titanium caseback piece (just wishing there)
-Correct dial material match and Font
-Correct Beveled date window
-Correct overall depth.
There IS a difference between variations in gen Rolex watches and
blatant disregard for a replica DSSD -that *could* meet and exceed expectation concerning those bullet points referenced above.
For what it is worth, when I buy a Gen Rolex....
I make damn certain it looks like a Rolex.
A gen Rolex (to me) has a certain look when looking at:
-Rehaut
-Case to bracelet fitment
-Case thickness/Depth
-Dial font/print
-Hour markers the correct size, AND the correct metallic thickness surrounding the lume.
One more thing:
Concerning my older replicas I once owned:
You could put them side by side with the gen, and NOT see such obvious variations to such effect that
the rep would be instantly called out, and hilarity would ensue...
If you ever buy a replica DSSD, I invite you to compare it next to a Gen...
The gen is such in a different league of quality componentry of its own.....it's not even funny!
We're not talking apples to oranges here (I cannot comment on the EuroTimez model) but as far as the
self proclaimed V5/ultimates are concerned.....They uber FAIL.
Bag it.
Big Time!
I definitely appreciate your opinion and input IndyBeretta, I do...
But when you say:
"That is why is is hard to tell gens from reps..variations of the gens over the years and even within a few months of production."
No way.
This replica just looks like a toy, and is easily spotted as a fake.
Looks is one thing, build quality is another.
When you have both not in your favor, pulling this off as a gen won't happen.
Work watch, the rep is a great alt.
Beater watch? Also a great fit.
But....Don't wear this around any WIS, or Swiss Made Watch aficionado!