cybee said:seanf said:There's nothing illegal or improper about creating movements. But the movement itself isn't illegal.
could be debatable considering the purpose of some of the movements is to create a false impression that a watch has a "genuine swiss" movement. Illegal or not they are doing a steller job at deception.
Two points to that. First off, I'm not sure that what we call an "Asian ETA Clone" would violate any copyright or patent laws. The reason being is that I'm not sure the standard ETA movement itself is protected. It may or it may not be. It depends on a couple of things (including whether they filed for a patent, how long they've had the patent, etc.). Which leads to the second point, and once the rep makers start putting cosmetic changes on the movement (like stamping ETA on them), then yes, that clearly violates copyright law. But that's not something you can lay at the feet of the movement manufacturer.