• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

How many of you...?

mike 8

Legendary Member
13/8/11
10,742
15
38
A very thoughtful comment Bonsey
I wish it were that simple.
Just wanted to give credit where it is due.
Other than that, I am steering clear of this thread.
Carry on.
 

Q5?

Legendary Member
Advisor
29/3/09
15,272
10
38
I'm lucky. My family insurance, through the union I'm a member of, has not changed.
 

mzcool

I'm Pretty Popular
2/6/13
1,090
0
0
Americas healthcare system is deeply flawed. Yet you criticize someone who's attempting reform? I really don't understand you guys. The rich pay more, the poor pay less based on your income and everyone gets the same treatment. It has been proven time and again that a healthy workforce is a productive workforce. An educated workforce is a productive workforce. You can't complain about things like economy and education and healthcare without accepting that if you take the stance of individuality and every man for himself you will quickly see your country delve deeper into troubles.

For a nation that prides itself on its Christian principles you sure do avoid trying to help each other.

I'm not sure where you got the idea that we're a socialist country though. We have elements of it, sure. By definition;

Socialism

a political doctrine, or system, which aims to make a classless society, by removing the nation's wealth (land, industries, transport system ) out of private into public hands.

We have some nationalised institutions, such as the NHS, a support system for those unable to work, a public broadcasting system etc.

I don't understand the fear that Americans have for helping and supporting their fellow countrymen.

*Some Americans

Some people in America take advantage of the system and then when someone else needs help, their response is "**** you".
 

thedoover

Snow Monkey Ambassador
Certified
15/6/10
2,120
27
48
Socialism is a term we American conservatives throw around when we mean the redistribution of wealth. It is an extreme term used to describe something less extreme but that I also disagree with to a certain degree. Im sure there is a line that when crossed most of us would disagree with the redistributiin of wealth.

Sent from my rotary phone
 

mzcool

I'm Pretty Popular
2/6/13
1,090
0
0
Socialism is a term we American conservatives throw around when we mean the redistribution of wealth. It is an extreme term used to describe something less extreme but that I also disagree with to a certain degree. Im sure there is a line that when crossed most of us would disagree with the redistributiin of wealth.

Sent from my rotary phone

Oh sure theres a line. However, people freak out when Bill De Blasio proposes a literally $40 a week tax on people who make a million a year, and start throwing that word around. They honestly think that helping to fund pre-school education is redistribution of wealth.
 

SertiSub

Active Member
24/7/13
331
0
16
Hey Do-right, hailing from the mecca of liberalism on the left coast.

When all else fails, start the insults and name-calling! Typical liberal tactic.

Facts are facts brotha. Are you suggesting these people are NOT losing their health insurance? Come on now... You must not have many friends, or maybe you just don't get out much...

This policy is a lose-lose for all involved. Except the government of course!
 

trailboss99

Head Honcho - Cat Herder
Staff member
Administrator
Certified
30/3/08
43,923
20,298
113
This thread will stay polite and NOT degenerate into name calling and/or personal attacks or it will be shut down, Mmmkay?
 

mch2112

Renowned Member
24/3/12
541
2
18
California
Funny how the people that hate Obama are the ones who seem to love the way healthcare has been going in this country. I guess they don't have preexisting conditions.
 

Luthier

Respected Member
30/9/09
5,050
9
0
Socialism is a term we American conservatives throw around when we mean the redistribution of wealth. It is an extreme term used to describe something less extreme but that I also disagree with to a certain degree. Im sure there is a line that when crossed most of us would disagree with the redistributiin of wealth.

Sent from my rotary phone
Absolutely correct. Why the hell I have to give away my hard earned money to some lazy people, who don't want to work? Why should I pay for their food, booze and health care? Sure, we are generous people, and we should help less fortunate. It should be voluntary, not a robbery.
Redistribution of wealth, mandating people to buy things, that they don't want to buy - IS socialism. Wire taping, collecting all information on citizens - IS socialism, if not worse. It remind me USSR.
 

Rush2112

Renowned Member
27/4/13
597
0
16
Didn't lose my insurance but is sure changed. I will wait and see to pass judgment but for starters there are more choices. Last few years we had 2 choices; the shitty plan the company offered or no insurance. Now I have about 15 choices from small deduction huge deductible to huge deduction no deductible.
 

walttoya

Known Member
3/6/12
119
0
16
My 2 Cents... When you Pledge to vote No and make a President a 1 term President you fail America. I am currently saving $2,800.00 for a Gold plan family of 4.
I will never agree totally with any President...

I want answers for the 5 Murdered Vets in the VA Hospital but since Obama/Hillary name is not attached, America will focus on Benghazi.

American Government has/will continue to Murder,Spy and Lie to the citizens.

I will only vote for the candidate that repeals the $20 million annual vacation budget and does not take annual trips to Africa or send your wife "Mrs. Bush" on 5 Africa trips alone...
 

wepiii

Active Member
18/12/12
459
0
0
Just because one doesn't support Obamacare doesn't mean they don't have any desire to help the less fortunate. Personally, I just don't think involving the government is going to actually help anyone in the long term... If everyone's plans are going down, then who is going to end up paying for it? Money is real, you can't just give things away to no end and forget to make sure that someone can write the check. All these subsidies are based on charging more for young peoples insurance. Young people are not buying insurance.

“That government is best which governs leastâ€

This pretty much sums up my fear with the ACA...

The power of the absence of government.

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.

Here's what you get. It's simple and quick, gives you all the information you need and links to the insurers so you can buy.

Via Chicks on the Right, with a hat tip to my friend Sarah Barnes, San Francisco residents Ning Liang, George Kalogeropoulous and Michael Wasser suspected that HealthCare.gov would have worked just fine if it had been thought through correctly from the start, and built using simple logic and basic common sense. In a few days, with a budget of exactly zero, they proved it. The UK's Daily Mail reports:

'They got it completely backwards in terms of what people want up front,' Liang told CBS News. The programmer continued: 'They want prices and benefits, so that they could make the decision.'

HealthSherpa.com, which is just two weeks old, allows a user to simply input their zip code and view all the health plans available to them.

The website claims: 'The Health Sherpa is a free guide that makes it easier to find and sign up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act. We only use carefully vetted, publicly available data.'

The programmers are also adding features to the site, such as a section on tax subsidies. But the three 20-year-olds say they worked on the project as a service rather than to make money.

I just tried it, simply inputting my zip code, and the available plans came up instantly. (And I'm working with a bit of a slow connection today thanks to something going on with Verizon. Every other site I try is slow, but this one came right up.)

Now in fairness to the proprietors of HealthGlitch.gov, HealthSherpa doesn't presume to do everything the real one is supposed to do. For example, you can't actually sign up for coverage. But it does provide links to the insurance companies so you can buy directly from them if you want. And maybe that's a better plan anyway. You click a link and you sign up. That is exponentially better than spending hours in ObamaCare web hell.

Remember, they built this thing in days. For free. Meanwhile, the federal government spent three years and $634 million and got a disaster, which they knew wouldn't work days before launch, but launched anyway because political promises overrule common sense at all times.

This is a perfect encapsulation of why everything is worse when government tries to run it. Three 20-year-old dudes with basic competence and a pretty clear idea of what they want to do can create something that works in a few days because they're not concerned with political patronage, politics, insane contracting rules, reporting requirements and the like. They're just concerned with getting the job done.

The government sees a project like this as an excuse to spend hundreds of millions of dollars and keep thousands of people busy, all in the service of creating something that doesn't work. And these are the same people who think they have to run health care, and everything else, because it will be fairer and better if mirco-managed by the "experts."

Maybe we'd be better off if we put 20-year-old dudes in charge of everything. All right. That might be pushing it.
 

i_like_shiney_things

Active Member
24/10/13
461
1
18
Coming from the UK I believe that everyone should have access to FREE and good quality health service... that said I have voted Conservative for the last 20 years and will continue to do so; I do not believe that people should have the right to free housing, free food, free everything when they could work if they wanted to... by the same principle I believe that if they genuinely can not work then they should have access to these things. The UK needs a much more stringent system of checking who should get these benefits.

All of that said I still pay quite a lot of money for private health insurance so I can get a comfortable private room, no waiting lists and nicer food :)
 

mzcool

I'm Pretty Popular
2/6/13
1,090
0
0
Absolutely correct. Why the hell I have to give away my hard earned money to some lazy people, who don't want to work? Why should I pay for their food, booze and health care? Sure, we are generous people, and we should help less fortunate. It should be voluntary, not a robbery.
Redistribution of wealth, mandating people to buy things, that they don't want to buy - IS socialism. Wire taping, collecting all information on citizens - IS socialism, if not worse. It remind me USSR.

What? Whose booze are you paying for, where do you even take this crap out of? Social Security, welfare, all those programs were here before you came here, and will be here after you are long gone.

Who are you to barge in here, into this country, and generalize that everyone on government services is lazy. I don't know if you were on any government services or not when you came here (great for you if you weren't), but most people on welfare don't have enough money for basic expenses. You live in some fantasy world where welfare recipients live in mansions and buy booze instead of the food that keeps them from starving.

Its quite laughable actually. I know plenty of Russians, mainly from Brooklyn, they are staunch Republicans and yet their mothers are on SSI, and Medicare.

You can talk all the crap you want about welfare, but I know plenty of people who immigrated here (my parents being two of those people), were originally on govt assistance, and then made it out of poverty, and without govt assistance, it will be much harder for people to move up in life, and just continue a poverty cycle.

Really, I don't understand how you come to a country, one that welcomed you, and gave you the opportunity to be successful, and now you feel that you can deny the same opportunity to others. You come here and then you look down on people who were here before you were.

Taking care of other people is not voluntary. When you come here, you are agreeing to help people who aren't doing as well, and in exchange you get the same back if you find yourself in a bad situation. If you don't like that, there are plenty of other countries in the world. Selfishness is one of the worst qualities one can have.

Wire tapping, and collecting info, started under a Republican president, by the way (Patriot Act, 2002).

Just because one doesn't support Obamacare doesn't mean they don't have any desire to help the less fortunate. Personally, I just don't think involving the government is going to actually help anyone in the long term... If everyone's plans are going down, then who is going to end up paying for it? Money is real, you can't just give things away to no end and forget to make sure that someone can write the check. All these subsidies are based on charging more for young peoples insurance. Young people are not buying insurance.

“That government is best which governs leastâ€

This pretty much sums up my fear with the ACA...

The power of the absence of government.

Want to make just about anything work better? Keep the government as far away from it as possible, then step back and behold the wonderment and goodness.

Here's what you get. It's simple and quick, gives you all the information you need and links to the insurers so you can buy.

Via Chicks on the Right, with a hat tip to my friend Sarah Barnes, San Francisco residents Ning Liang, George Kalogeropoulous and Michael Wasser suspected that HealthCare.gov would have worked just fine if it had been thought through correctly from the start, and built using simple logic and basic common sense. In a few days, with a budget of exactly zero, they proved it. The UK's Daily Mail reports:

'They got it completely backwards in terms of what people want up front,' Liang told CBS News. The programmer continued: 'They want prices and benefits, so that they could make the decision.'

HealthSherpa.com, which is just two weeks old, allows a user to simply input their zip code and view all the health plans available to them.

The website claims: 'The Health Sherpa is a free guide that makes it easier to find and sign up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act. We only use carefully vetted, publicly available data.'

The programmers are also adding features to the site, such as a section on tax subsidies. But the three 20-year-olds say they worked on the project as a service rather than to make money.

I just tried it, simply inputting my zip code, and the available plans came up instantly. (And I'm working with a bit of a slow connection today thanks to something going on with Verizon. Every other site I try is slow, but this one came right up.)

Now in fairness to the proprietors of HealthGlitch.gov, HealthSherpa doesn't presume to do everything the real one is supposed to do. For example, you can't actually sign up for coverage. But it does provide links to the insurance companies so you can buy directly from them if you want. And maybe that's a better plan anyway. You click a link and you sign up. That is exponentially better than spending hours in ObamaCare web hell.

Remember, they built this thing in days. For free. Meanwhile, the federal government spent three years and $634 million and got a disaster, which they knew wouldn't work days before launch, but launched anyway because political promises overrule common sense at all times.

This is a perfect encapsulation of why everything is worse when government tries to run it. Three 20-year-old dudes with basic competence and a pretty clear idea of what they want to do can create something that works in a few days because they're not concerned with political patronage, politics, insane contracting rules, reporting requirements and the like. They're just concerned with getting the job done.

The government sees a project like this as an excuse to spend hundreds of millions of dollars and keep thousands of people busy, all in the service of creating something that doesn't work. And these are the same people who think they have to run health care, and everything else, because it will be fairer and better if mirco-managed by the "experts."

Maybe we'd be better off if we put 20-year-old dudes in charge of everything. All right. That might be pushing it.

Weipii, I completely agree with you that Healthcare.gov was mishandled. That is a result of bureaucratic bullshit.

My brother worked on the tech team for Obama 2012. In two years they created the same tech systems that gave Obama the edge over Romney.

My brother works at Amazon Web Services now. It is a huge company, with tons of bright people working there. Yet, they can't even get a government contract for something like healthcare.gov, even if they wanted to. It is incredibly complicated to bid and win bids for federal government work. Thats the reason why stuff like this happens, because the government's BS is blocking good companies from getting govt contracts and instead awards them to people who know how to take advantage of the bid system, but aren't really the most qualified.
 

rhp1462

Mythical Poster
20/2/13
6,617
9
38
What? Whose booze are you paying for, where do you even take this crap out of? Social Security, welfare, all those programs were here before you came here, and will be here after you are long gone.

Who are you to barge in here, into this country, and generalize that everyone on government services is lazy. I don't know if you were on any government services or not when you came here (great for you if you weren't), but most people on welfare don't have enough money for basic expenses. You live in some fantasy world where welfare recipients live in mansions and buy booze instead of the food that keeps them from starving.

Its quite laughable actually. I know plenty of Russians, mainly from Brooklyn, they are staunch Republicans and yet their mothers are on SSI, and Medicare.

You can talk all the crap you want about welfare, but I know plenty of people who immigrated here (my parents being two of those people), were originally on govt assistance, and then made it out of poverty, and without govt assistance, it will be much harder for people to move up in life, and just continue a poverty cycle.

Really, I don't understand how you come to a country, one that welcomed you, and gave you the opportunity to be successful, and now you feel that you can deny the same opportunity to others. You come here and then you look down on people who were here before you were.

Wire tapping, and collecting info, started under a Republican president, by the way (Patriot Act, 2002).

I agree 100% with you about patriot act. Obama haters are all worked up about it while forgetting that it was bush era when it was implemented.

I have to say that there is a lots of abuse of government programs. There are people who could work but are not interested. People come in at where I work, ask for application and never return with it. Imam guessing it was to just show that they ar actively pursuing employment. My ass.
I have seen it growing up and I am still seeing it. I have known people who are on govt. assistance because of bad back yet they are ready to work under table(construction none the less). I am not generalizing and saying that everybody is like that. I have also known families who could have really used assurance but could not get it because some lazy ************ decided to use it.
I am not against government assistance. I am against a broken system. Government needs to fix the existing system before it adds new programs and new recipients.

As TB said, let us keep this civil. No need to be excited.


Sent from 1:1 app mad with a gen Tapatalk as sample.
 

mzcool

I'm Pretty Popular
2/6/13
1,090
0
0
I agree 100% with you about patriot act. Obama haters are all worked up about it while forgetting that it was bush era when it was implemented.

I have to say that there is a lots of abuse of government programs. There are people who could work but are not interested. People come in at where I work, ask for application and never return with it. Imam guessing it was to just show that they ar actively pursuing employment. My ass.
I have seen it growing up and I am still seeing it. I have known people who are on govt. assistance because of bad back yet they are ready to work under table(construction none the less). I am not generalizing and saying that everybody is like that. I have also known families who could have really used assurance but could not get it because some lazy ************ decided to use it.
I am not against government assistance. I am against a broken system. Government needs to fix the existing system before it adds new programs and new recipients.

As TB said, let us keep this civil. No need to be excited.


Sent from 1:1 app mad with a gen Tapatalk as sample.

I agree with you that there is abuse, and that must be fixed. However, it really irks me when people just say that a sizeable portion of the population is lazy, because they are less fortunate than others.

I'm not blind, I know there is plenty of abuse, and that is unfortunate, but I think its wrong to punish everyone for the actions of others.

Cuts are not the answer to this, increased oversight is.
 

Tonyy

Renowned Member
3/7/13
730
0
0
I'm all for helping immigrants needing government assistance. The ones that work hard and make something of themselves. It's the people on welfare that assume more fortunate people will be paying for them and still don't do jack, aka lazy bums.

My grandparents (both sides) came here as refugees from Vietnam with nothing..zilch. Only the clothes on their backs and my toddler father/mother in their arms. Now he's the president of a countrywide organization. He wouldn't have made it without the help of the government.

Difference is, people had pride back then. Work long, hard hours and save every penny for their children. Now? Well, turn on the news and you'll see what this world has come to. Get as much as you can while doing as little as you can.
 

mzcool

I'm Pretty Popular
2/6/13
1,090
0
0
I'm all for helping immigrants needing government assistance. The ones that work hard and make something of themselves. It's the people on welfare that assume more fortunate people will be paying for them and still don't do jack, aka lazy bums.

My grandparents (both sides) came here as refugees from Vietnam with nothing..zilch. Only the clothes on their backs and my toddler father/mother in their arms. Now he's the president of a countrywide organization. He wouldn't have made it without the help of the government.

Difference is, people had pride back then. Work long, hard hours and save every penny for their children. Now? Well, turn on the news and you'll see what this world has come to. Get as much as you can while doing as little as you can.


I can sympathize with you. My parents came here after the collapse of the Soviet Union with $100 in the early 90's, and are both fairly successful now, in part due to government assistance that helped get them on their feet.

I too have been disappointed at what has transpired recently, but still, when I drive through working class neighborhoods near me, see plenty of hard working day laborers, working for peanuts so that their kids can have a better life than them.