All BP 1661x ETA Subs have a datewheel, dial date window, and cyclops in the ETA/DG native position. This was done IMO to specifically avoid the need for a DWO because fitting a DWO to a 2824 is a major PITA. There is extremely little vertical clearance for one both below it due to movement parts and above it due to dial underside proximity.
This is a TC movement that I epoxied a second 2824 DW to after grinding off the teeth. You can see the double thickness on the edge. A DWO has a smaller inside diameter, which will still conflict with that screw sticking up for the minute train bridge. So it will have to be replaced with one that has a shorter, flatter head or this one can be sanded down to about half that height.
Ive also added 2 layers of narrow strips of bracelet tape to the dial spacer, which for a TC is built in to the movement holder.
I've also very carefully sanded and polished the TC dial underside to remove a slight amount of material and eliminate the usual marker glue remnants and other roughness and aberrations. The DWO fit is that tight, it can require some or all of these mods. That's why BP isn't going to do it on a $300 rep.
Difference in date window positions - Rolex vs ETA
If you don't change the crystal, your cyclops will not align with the 3135 dial date window and DW.
BP Kermits
Stock 2824 - Note the correct hour hand, wrong maxi second hand, wrong datewheel position. CGs slightly shorter than 3135 version.
Stock SA3135 - Note the wrong maxi hour and second hands, CGs longer than 2824 version
Modded SA3135 - Hands corrected with BP SA3135 LN hands