- 8/2/11
- 3,480
- 714
- 113
I don't like those. I don't think I'll ever get the rubber strap thing. A bracelet is as much part of the watch than the watch head itself is. I don't get those folks that spend $$$$$ on a watch with a rubber band on it.
Also, you cannot fit a metal bracelet onto a genuine Oysterflex model, the holes are in a different place.. but you can fit a (aftermarket) rubber strap on a metal bracelet model.. what gives? Why would anyone..
Rubber strap on a rolex is like putting hubcaps on a Rolls Royce... personally I dont find it appealing either but others like it so to each their own.
Please in 316f instead of 904L
FYI. Just a different perspective...to each his own. I get what you’re saying RE hubcaps on a Rolls, however I wear a rubber strap on my gen Explorer II because the bracelet scratches my laptop while working and the bracelet on the 42mm gets quite heavy after wearing it the whole day. So I end up wearing my rubber strap as a daily and bracelet versions over the weekends.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rubber strap on a rolex is like putting hubcaps on a Rolls Royce... personally I dont find it appealing either but others like it so to each their own.
Rubber strap on a rolex is like putting hubcaps on a Rolls Royce... personally I dont find it appealing either but others like it so to each their own.
the bracelet on the 42mm gets quite heavy after wearing it the whole day